Not that I know of. However, you might try the Dahua IPC-A35.I can't find this model outside the US, Is there another name for it in Europe/APAC ?
I can only attest to the Amcrest; it's 2MP/1080p whereas the Dahua is 3MP/2048p so when the light is good, the Dahua will have better resolution. However, the Amcrest may perform in color with less light, the Dahua may switch on it's IR "sooner" to see, both have IR for low or no lighting.Thanks for that. and sorry for coming back that late.
Now I need to make a purchsae
for me, Dahua A35 and Amcrest cost about the same including shipping and everything.
from this two, which one will be better ?
Thats super cool of you. Thanks.I happen to have both a recent Amcrest PTZ (IP2M-841B, 2MP) & @EMPIRETECANDY Dahua (DH-IPC-K35A, 3MP). If it would help I can setup a quick side-by-side after work if you really need to see the difference between them. I just need to know whether indoor low-light, indoor moderate lighting, indoor bright lighting or outdoor lighting is the most important to you and I can post some snapshots.
FWIW, if you're in the U.S. of A. then the IP2M-841 is only $50 on amazon here.OK, Obiously Amcrest
Now, Which one...
IP2M - 80$
IP3M - Should I consider ?
IP4M - 100$
The IP4M isn't too much for in house ?
IMO, the 2MP/IP2M in the images posted by @crw030 look the best. I think the 2MP will perform better in the lighting that your home interior will most likely provide.I'm not, this is why I pay 30$ for shipping worldwide.
I just not sure I need 4M ?
Why would 2MP perform better in indoor light condition ? If I may ask.IMO, the 2MP/IP2M in the images posted by @crw030 look the best. I think the 2MP will perform better in the lighting that your home interior will most likely provide.
That's just my 2 cents.
If you're wanting lots of detail, like being able to clearly see what someone is doing up close, then you'll need more light that what he had in his sample images.