Sybertiger
Known around here
Wow, that's disgusting!
Money & Economics
- Thread starter bigredfish
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
Even Funnier!
January Jobs Shocker: Payrolls Explode By 353K, Double The Expected And Higher Than All Estimate As Wages Surge
January Jobs Shocker: Payrolls Explode By 353K, Double The Expected And Higher Than All Estimate As Wages Surge | ZeroHedge
With Wall Street expecting a continued declines in the pace of monthly growth, and consensus looking for a decline from last month's 219K print to 185K, the BLS decided to once again show logic and common sense who is boss, and damn your mass tech layoff torpedoes...
January Jobs Shocker: Payrolls Explode By 353K, Double The Expected And Higher Than All Estimate As Wages Surge
January Jobs Shocker: Payrolls Explode By 353K, Double The Expected And Higher Than All Estimate As Wages Surge | ZeroHedge
With Wall Street expecting a continued declines in the pace of monthly growth, and consensus looking for a decline from last month's 219K print to 185K, the BLS decided to once again show logic and common sense who is boss, and damn your mass tech layoff torpedoes...
... it reported that in January the US created a ridiculous 353K jobs...
bigredfish
Known around here
Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History
Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History | ZeroHedge
There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in January 2024, the US had 133.1 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 870K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.890 million).
Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the jobs have been part-time jobs!
But wait there's even more, because just as we enter the peak of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in January, the number of native-born worker tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 1.9 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 2 months!
Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History | ZeroHedge
There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in January 2024, the US had 133.1 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 870K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.890 million).
Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the jobs have been part-time jobs!
But wait there's even more, because just as we enter the peak of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in January, the number of native-born worker tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 1.9 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 2 months!
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 14,030
- Reaction score
- 23,362
Gotta lower those interest rates ..
Thought I smelt a RAT!!!Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History
Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History | ZeroHedge
There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in January 2024, the US had 133.1 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 870K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.890 million).
Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the jobs have been part-time jobs!
But wait there's even more, because just as we enter the peak of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in January, the number of native-born worker tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 1.9 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 2 months!
When just one job isn't enough: Why are a growing number of Americans taking on multiple gigs?
The number of Americans holding multiple jobs has reached its highest level since the pandemic's start. Inflation, remote work may be factors.
www.usatoday.com
bigredfish
Known around here
We used to just call it "buying votes"...
"Tax Relief Act" Exposed: Something Ominous Lurks Inside...
"Tax Relief Act" Exposed: Something Ominous Lurks Inside... | ZeroHedge
A recent article published on The Daily Signal revealed that legislation claiming to provide tax relief for the middle class doesn’t quite do what it says it will:
"Tax Relief Act" Exposed: Something Ominous Lurks Inside...
"Tax Relief Act" Exposed: Something Ominous Lurks Inside... | ZeroHedge
A recent article published on The Daily Signal revealed that legislation claiming to provide tax relief for the middle class doesn’t quite do what it says it will:
Here’s exactly what this “Tax Relief” entails for those of us trying to plan for our taxes:
bigredfish
Known around here
The Great Growth Hoax
The Great Growth Hoax | ZeroHedge
We Don’t Need More GDP Reports Like These
When the latest report came out and everyone cheered, I dug around the data a bit but figured I would wait for my favorite analysts to weigh in. Sure enough, Peter St Onge writes it up and it is a doozy:
Fresh GDP numbers came in and it was a blowout. The kind of blowout that only a $2.7 trillion government deficit can buy while the private economy crumbles around it. Another couple blowout GDP reports like this and Americans will be living under an overpass.
The essential ruse comes down to unfathomable amounts of government spending that is being recorded as productivity and output, and interpreted by the media as growth:
In the past 12 months the federal deficit increased by $1.3 trillion. Yet we only got half that in GDP — about $600 billion. In other words, everything else shrank. It’s even worse for that brave and stunning Q4 — there we got just $300 billion in extra GDP for — wait for it — $834 billion of new federal debt.
To put a fine point on it:
Essentially, [GDP is measuring] the pace at which we’re going Soviet, replacing private wealth with government waste.
It Costs $2.50 to Generate $1
In his interpretation of the data, we are destroying wealth at the fastest rate since 2008. An analysis by Zero Hedge echoes the same thought:
While Q4 GDP rose by $329 billion to $27.939 trillion, a respectable if made-up number, what is much more disturbing is that over the same time period, the U.S. budget deficit rose by more than 50%, or $510 billion. And the cherry on top: The increase in public U.S. debt in the same three-month period was a stunning $834 billion, or 154% more than the increase in GDP. In other words, it now takes $1.55 in budget deficit to generate $1 of growth… and it takes over $2.50 in new debt to generate $1 of GDP growth!
To further the analysis, and doing the math:
Every dollar in GDP growth cost $1.69 in new debt, and also means that every new job cost future generations of Americans $957,100.48.
To say this is unsustainable is more than obvious. It is a disaster and this is dragging American prosperity into the pits, if by prosperity you mean quality of life. No matter how many gizmos to which you have access, the resources for living a good life are depleting very fast.
The Great Growth Hoax | ZeroHedge
We Don’t Need More GDP Reports Like These
When the latest report came out and everyone cheered, I dug around the data a bit but figured I would wait for my favorite analysts to weigh in. Sure enough, Peter St Onge writes it up and it is a doozy:
Fresh GDP numbers came in and it was a blowout. The kind of blowout that only a $2.7 trillion government deficit can buy while the private economy crumbles around it. Another couple blowout GDP reports like this and Americans will be living under an overpass.
The essential ruse comes down to unfathomable amounts of government spending that is being recorded as productivity and output, and interpreted by the media as growth:
In the past 12 months the federal deficit increased by $1.3 trillion. Yet we only got half that in GDP — about $600 billion. In other words, everything else shrank. It’s even worse for that brave and stunning Q4 — there we got just $300 billion in extra GDP for — wait for it — $834 billion of new federal debt.
To put a fine point on it:
Essentially, [GDP is measuring] the pace at which we’re going Soviet, replacing private wealth with government waste.
It Costs $2.50 to Generate $1
In his interpretation of the data, we are destroying wealth at the fastest rate since 2008. An analysis by Zero Hedge echoes the same thought:
While Q4 GDP rose by $329 billion to $27.939 trillion, a respectable if made-up number, what is much more disturbing is that over the same time period, the U.S. budget deficit rose by more than 50%, or $510 billion. And the cherry on top: The increase in public U.S. debt in the same three-month period was a stunning $834 billion, or 154% more than the increase in GDP. In other words, it now takes $1.55 in budget deficit to generate $1 of growth… and it takes over $2.50 in new debt to generate $1 of GDP growth!
To further the analysis, and doing the math:
Every dollar in GDP growth cost $1.69 in new debt, and also means that every new job cost future generations of Americans $957,100.48.
To say this is unsustainable is more than obvious. It is a disaster and this is dragging American prosperity into the pits, if by prosperity you mean quality of life. No matter how many gizmos to which you have access, the resources for living a good life are depleting very fast.
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 14,030
- Reaction score
- 23,362
"It Costs $2.50 to Generate $1"
see ... we can generate a soft landing .. just need to stimulate more ..
bigredfish
Known around here
Exactly!
Hear me out…
Stimulus = issuing money we don’t have going further into the debt spiral in order to provide free shit to the terminally stupid in return for their vote while masking the reality in language they don’t understand.
I think the primary answer to most of our current problems are the deliberate twisting/obfuscation of language which goes to its roots in education.
Imagine if we still called “stimulus” what it really is.
We see the same throughout government, especially in the names of laws passed. It’s become almost common.
Example
Inflation Reduction Act
Does nothing of the sort and much of it goes to the bogus “climate change” agenda
Would the average idiot know that from the language used? Of course not.
Hear me out…
Stimulus = issuing money we don’t have going further into the debt spiral in order to provide free shit to the terminally stupid in return for their vote while masking the reality in language they don’t understand.
I think the primary answer to most of our current problems are the deliberate twisting/obfuscation of language which goes to its roots in education.
Imagine if we still called “stimulus” what it really is.
We see the same throughout government, especially in the names of laws passed. It’s become almost common.
Example
Inflation Reduction Act
Does nothing of the sort and much of it goes to the bogus “climate change” agenda
Would the average idiot know that from the language used? Of course not.
bigredfish
Known around here
This is the root. They can barely spell their name and aren’t even sure if they’re male or female. Using language they can’t comprehend makes it quite easy to baffle them into agreement, and giving them free shit keeps them on the reservation.
tigerwillow1
Known around here
Here's another new scheme to enrich the wall street types. I wonder how much in kickbacks the sponsor is getting?
401Kids Account: Wyden introduces bill to create savings accounts for every child nationwide
It claims that every dollar "invested", society would get $2.61 in benefits. Wonder which end they pulled that out of?
401Kids Account: Wyden introduces bill to create savings accounts for every child nationwide
It claims that every dollar "invested", society would get $2.61 in benefits. Wonder which end they pulled that out of?
bigredfish
Known around here
While all families could contribute up to $2,500 per year to the accounts, only lower- and moderate-income families would receive direct federal support.
Just another convenient way to buy votes(ers)
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 14,030
- Reaction score
- 23,362
Gotta pump up the stock market more .. retirees will be putting their funds in less risky vehicles ..
bigredfish
Known around here
We went to our yearly visit with our Financial Advisor yesterday. He kept saying ya'll don't have anything in stocks, as he does every year. When he compared years he saw we have had a steady investment income, no losses, and actually was on the same pace as those in the stock market. He is younger and has always pushed the market. He was also amazed how we can live so cheaply, haha, he said we have one of the lowest monthly income/expenses he has seen. It is called wisely spending/buying within your means, something the younger generation has no clue about. They buy on impulse...
I expected a stock market downturn and recession by 2023, moved to more conservative investments, waiting to jump partially back in. I think they are trying to push it off till after the election from some reason!
tigerwillow1
Known around here
In my old age I'm just tired of the stress of watching the stuff go up and down with herd mentality, manipulation, and emotion instead of any hint of logic. The I-bonds from the late 90s and early 00s with a 3+% base rate have been our best long term investments, and stress-free.
bigredfish
Known around here
yeah, they are hiding the true economy with BS made up numbers out of BLS and GDP games along with massive deficit spending.
Unless we get a banking crisis they'll keep the false data coming and hold off the downturn until after the election...if we have one
IF we dont have a banking crisis...
New York Community Bancorp Cut To 'Junk' By Moody's: 33% Of Deposits Uninsured
New York Community Bancorp Cut To 'Junk' By Moody's: 33% Of Deposits Uninsured | ZeroHedge
New York Community Bancorp Collapse Nears 27-Year-Lows After 'Talks With Regulator' Revealed | ZeroHedge
Bank Blow-Up 'Butterflies' Spark Bid For Bonds, Bullion, & Bitcoin | ZeroHedge
Unless we get a banking crisis they'll keep the false data coming and hold off the downturn until after the election...if we have one
IF we dont have a banking crisis...
New York Community Bancorp Cut To 'Junk' By Moody's: 33% Of Deposits Uninsured
New York Community Bancorp Cut To 'Junk' By Moody's: 33% Of Deposits Uninsured | ZeroHedge
New York Community Bancorp Collapse Nears 27-Year-Lows After 'Talks With Regulator' Revealed | ZeroHedge
Bank Blow-Up 'Butterflies' Spark Bid For Bonds, Bullion, & Bitcoin | ZeroHedge
Sybertiger
Known around here
Not sure what bonds are doing but for those who want FDIC backing, interest at 4.35% and full liquidity:
www.discover.com
High Yield Savings Account - No Monthly Fees | Discover
High-Interest Savings Accounts from Discover Bank, Member FDIC offer high yield interest rates with no monthly balance requirements or monthly fees, all online.