- Aug 7, 2017
- 418
- 225
Hi guys
I think it would be very safe for you guys to use port forwarding as long as you enable MAC address filtering. Certain routers allow this feature where, even if you port forward, you can set a firewall rule stating that the inbound device (such as a iPhone) must have this particular MAC address (i.e.): FC:BC:48:A3:55:92 before it can pass through to the internal device at: 192.168.1.200 (your NVR).
This means that before the router forwards the requests through the port to the NVR or a camera, the router is authenticating the MAC address.
You may ask, well, what if they are spoofing your MAC address. Yes, indeed that is also possible. But the odds of spoofing the correct MAC address is 1 in 281,474,976,710,656. That's 281 trillion! Again, this is just another layer of security. I think a good firewall can also blacklist an inbound IP that is trying to hammer a port with the wrong MAC address as well.
Thoughts??
I think it would be very safe for you guys to use port forwarding as long as you enable MAC address filtering. Certain routers allow this feature where, even if you port forward, you can set a firewall rule stating that the inbound device (such as a iPhone) must have this particular MAC address (i.e.): FC:BC:48:A3:55:92 before it can pass through to the internal device at: 192.168.1.200 (your NVR).
This means that before the router forwards the requests through the port to the NVR or a camera, the router is authenticating the MAC address.
You may ask, well, what if they are spoofing your MAC address. Yes, indeed that is also possible. But the odds of spoofing the correct MAC address is 1 in 281,474,976,710,656. That's 281 trillion! Again, this is just another layer of security. I think a good firewall can also blacklist an inbound IP that is trying to hammer a port with the wrong MAC address as well.
Thoughts??