US Elections (& Politics) :)

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,636
Reaction score
16,081
Location
Cypress, California
Pollster: Hageman Leading Cheney by 57 Points Among Likely Republican Voters (Bret Baier will say it's too close to call)

Trump-endorsed Harriet Hageman is leading Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) by 57 points among Republican voters likely to vote in the Wyoming GOP primary, Brian Harnisch, the director of the University of Wyoming’s Wyoming Survey and Analysis Center (WYSAC) stated on Thursday.

“When looking only at residents who say they are Republican and likely voters in the primary, we actually see Hageman leading by roughly 50 points,” the Wyoming pollster said about the August 16 primary race.

Harnisch’s poll found that Hageman has maintained her lead over Cheney by about 29 points when voters of all affiliations are in the mix. The poll sampled 562 likely Wyoming voters from all political affiliations from July 25-August 6 and has a four point margin of error.

“Given the unique attention this race is receiving, and the accompanying increases in voter registration and potential party switching, we decided to field this survey to a random sample of all Wyoming residents on cell phones and landlines and work to identify likely voters in the GOP primary,” Harnisch said.

Hageman’s lead seems to be a referendum on Cheney rather than outright support of Hageman. Cheney has allied herself with the January 6 Committee she sits on, which has sought to investigate the January 6 incident without focusing on the alleged FBI informants at the Capitol.

Pollster: Hageman Leading Cheney by 57 Points Among GOP Voters (breitbart.com)

My comment: :D :D :D :clap::clap::clap:
 

SyconsciousAu

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
872
Reaction score
825
I'll repost
If you keep saying it, it doesn't make it any more factual. Lets look at the qualifiers used.


During his decade of representing Epstein and associated clients, Reinhart was named in a Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit in 2011. He was accused of violating the Justice Department’s policy of switching sides and potentially leveraging insider information about Epstein’s case in order to curry favor, the Miami Herald alleged. He also made plans to set up his private practice when he was still serving as a federal prosecutor in South Florida, the outlet alleged in another article.

In 2011, Reinhart swore under penalty of perjury that he had nothing to do with Epstein’s investigation and had zero information on his case, but his supervisors filed a court paper contradicting the claim, the Miami Herald reported.

“While Bruce E. Reinhart was an assistant U.S. attorney, he learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter … [Reinhart] ‘joined Epstein’s payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein’s criminal liability’ and improperly represented Epstein victims in follow-on civil suits,” plaintiffs in the Jane Does #1 and #2 v. United States case alleged.

Reinhart reportedly quit working for the U.S. attorney’s office on New Years Day of 2008 and started working for Epstein on January 2, 2008, the New York Post reported. His clients included Epstein’s pilots, his scheduler and a woman called Nadia Marcinkova, who Epstein described as his “Yugoslavian sex slave,” according to the outlet.


If you are going to question things, question everything. The media are merely advertising platforms. Their objective is to make money. Weasel words like alleged, accused, and reportedly, should be your red flags. How many articles have you read about Donald Trump which used those same words? Is Trump dirty? If we accept your standard of proof in relation to Judge Reinhart we have to accept the same standard of proof in relation to Trump. Of Course that's ludicrous, because we should never accept that standard of proof in relation to anyone. I've had similar arguments with people who have made similar claims about Trump based on similar information. I don't care what your political leanings are. People deserve a fair shake.
 

Sybertiger

Known around here
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
4,715
Reaction score
13,611
Location
Orlando
I see plenty of stories on how Liz Cheney is begging the Democrat voters in Wyoming to switch parties and vote for her. She is running spots on how they can do it. What a friggin loser.
Spent most of her time in Congress in a personal war against Trump rather than making America great.
 

Sybertiger

Known around here
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
4,715
Reaction score
13,611
Location
Orlando
If you are going to question things, question everything. The media are merely advertising platforms. Their objective is to make money. Weasel words like alleged, accused, and reportedly, should be your red flags. How many articles have you read about Donald Trump which used those same words? Is Trump dirty? If we accept your standard of proof in relation to Judge Reinhart we have to accept the same standard of proof in relation to Trump. Of Course that's ludicrous, because we should never accept that standard of proof in relation to anyone. I've had similar arguments with people who have made similar claims about Trump based on similar information. I don't care what your political leanings are. People deserve a fair shake.
Hmm, Trump investigated and harassed for 7 years and what did they find? Nada, zilch, zero, zip....it's amazing that Trump got done what he did. He hasn't received a "fair shake" and if the past is an indicator of the present or future then we know wherein lies the corruption and lies....the hypocrite, conspiring libs and their minions. Nuff said and no further comment on this particular abuse of power until we get some answers.
 
Last edited:

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,601
Reaction score
48,957
Location
Floriduh
If you keep saying it, it doesn't make it any more factual. Lets look at the qualifiers used.


During his decade of representing Epstein and associated clients, Reinhart was named in a Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit in 2011. He was accused of violating the Justice Department’s policy of switching sides and potentially leveraging insider information about Epstein’s case in order to curry favor, the Miami Herald alleged. He also made plans to set up his private practice when he was still serving as a federal prosecutor in South Florida, the outlet alleged in another article.

In 2011, Reinhart swore under penalty of perjury that he had nothing to do with Epstein’s investigation and had zero information on his case, but his supervisors filed a court paper contradicting the claim, the Miami Herald reported.

“While Bruce E. Reinhart was an assistant U.S. attorney, he learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter … [Reinhart] ‘joined Epstein’s payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein’s criminal liability’ and improperly represented Epstein victims in follow-on civil suits,” plaintiffs in the Jane Does #1 and #2 v. United States case alleged.

Reinhart reportedly quit working for the U.S. attorney’s office on New Years Day of 2008 and started working for Epstein on January 2, 2008, the New York Post reported. His clients included Epstein’s pilots, his scheduler and a woman called Nadia Marcinkova, who Epstein described as his “Yugoslavian sex slave,” according to the outlet.


If you are going to question things, question everything. The media are merely advertising platforms. Their objective is to make money. Weasel words like alleged, accused, and reportedly, should be your red flags. How many articles have you read about Donald Trump which used those same words? Is Trump dirty? If we accept your standard of proof in relation to Judge Reinhart we have to accept the same standard of proof in relation to Trump. Of Course that's ludicrous, because we should never accept that standard of proof in relation to anyone. I've had similar arguments with people who have made similar claims about Trump based on similar information. I don't care what your political leanings are. People deserve a fair shake.
If you want to think he's all honest and clean, knock yourself out. You have a right to your opinion.
The "weasel" words were from this article, NOT the sources you cited. SOMEBODY has to report it. And Im just a tiny bit less naive than your word salad implies. ;)

Court filings do indeed show his superiors thought he was lying, whomever "reports" it.
 

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,636
Reaction score
16,081
Location
Cypress, California
FBI searched Trump’s home to look for nuclear documents and other items, sources say

Classified documents relating to nuclear weapons were among the items FBI agents sought in a search of former president Donald Trump’s Florida residence on Monday, according to people familiar with the investigation.

Experts in classified information said the unusual search underscores deep concern among government officials about the types of information they thought could be located at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club and potentially in danger of falling into the wrong hands.

FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago related to nuclear documents, sources say - The Washington Post

Comments from another forum: So, Brandon lost the football, and he thinks Trump took it?

I’m sure Melania was hiding nuclear launch codes in her underwear drawer. A$$hats.

100%, Grade A, USDA Certified bull crap
 

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,636
Reaction score
16,081
Location
Cypress, California
Now that we know Eric Trump made sure the security cams kept recording despite FBI asking that they be turned off during the raid we gonna get some good sniffing footage.
Yes, and someone said that the bad actions of the FBI that were recorded will be released. I have nothing to back this up, it is just what someone posted.
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,601
Reaction score
48,957
Location
Floriduh
FBI searched Trump’s home to look for nuclear documents and other items, sources say

Classified documents relating to nuclear weapons were among the items FBI agents sought in a search of former president Donald Trump’s Florida residence on Monday, according to people familiar with the investigation.

Experts in classified information said the unusual search underscores deep concern among government officials about the types of information they thought could be located at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club and potentially in danger of falling into the wrong hands.

FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago related to nuclear documents, sources say - The Washington Post

Comments from another forum: So, Brandon lost the football, and he thinks Trump took it?

I’m sure Melania was hiding nuclear launch codes in her underwear drawer. A$$hats.

100%, Grade A, USDA Certified bull crap

So let me see if I have this right:
The Eff Be Eye was worried Trump had classified information on Nukes that might fall into the wrong hands,,..... and they were so worried about this that they took a year and a half to finally go get them?

The Washington Post on Thursday published a ‘leak’ from so-called government officials who claimed the FBI searched Trump’s Florida residence for classified records related to nuclear weapons.

The FBI raid was so urgent that the US government waited for more than a year-and-a-half after Trump left office to search for records related to ‘nuclear weapons.’
 
Top