mbuster
Getting comfortable
Ought to use the remdesivir and a ventilator this time.
US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
After doing stupid shit on the bridge they can go steal $900 worth of merchandise from a local store
Joe when you drink from the well,
This is why you are sick again...
This is why you are sick again...
Sewage poses potential COVID-19 transmission risk, experts warn
Environmental biologists have warned that the potential spread of COVID-19 via sewage 'must not be neglected' in the battle to protect human health.
www.sciencedaily.com
Parley
Known around here
The dumbass was just bragging how he beat President Trump on Covid even though the strains are way different. Serves the idiot right. Hahahaha
bigredfish
Known around here
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
the Court does not by now know who leaked the opinion, it would seem to constitute a breathtaking display of incompetence.
If the Court does know who leaked the opinion, yet for whatever reason is sitting on its findings, it would seem to constitute a breathtaking display of politics.
That’s because, on the merits, the silence is indefensible.
What could be of greater import to the institution’s integrity and credibility than to demonstrate that it will stop at nothing to, and with great haste, find and bring to justice an individual who would so grievously undermine the Court’s ability to do its most basic duty: deliberate, discreetly and insulated from political pressure and intimidation.
Silence on the leak probe only compounds the error of not ruling expeditiously in the wake of the leak, which fueled what else but a campaign of political pressure and intimidation up to and including threats to the life and limb of the judges.
Does the chief justice, so attuned to public opinion about the Court, think the probe can be cast as some kind of internal matter to be handled privately, and made to fade into the ether?
Do the findings implicate one or several justices, and as such, is the chief justice unsure how to proceed with the public?
SyconsciousAu
Getting comfortable
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2015
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 825
That's a little bit harsh. I could understand your point of view if the document was never intended to be public, but Court Decisions, and for that matter all business of the Court, are generally meant to be publicly available on the principle that justice must be done and be seen to be done. I think it's unreasonable to expect that they would take the time to add in the document protection measures that would make identifying who leaked the copy straight forward, when the document was always going to be public eventually.
mbuster
Getting comfortable
There would have been no reason to leak a done deal as you propose it was. It would have only been done with the purpose of trying to influence the final outcome, if thats not the case, there should have been an immediate, yup, here it is,
Look for Fox News to be stepping away from any appearance of support for Trump over the next few months ==>> The Murdochs and Trump aligned for mutual benefit. That may be changing.
Parley
Known around here
I saw where there is to be no support for President Trump on Fox News. I have dumped Fox News.Look for Fox News to be stepping away from any appearance of support for Trump over the next few months ==>> The Murdochs and Trump aligned for mutual benefit. That may be changing.
Oceanslider
Known around here
A ride through the neighborhood of the democrat base. What are they doing to change things, other than telling men that they can be women and women that they can be men?
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Those who have been here long enough know that the weather seems the same the last 50+ years.
Oceanslider
Known around here
Needless to say, Trump would have already been going through impeachment proceedings for doing this…
Last edited:
SyconsciousAu
Getting comfortable
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2015
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 825
Of course it could ONLY be that right? Imagine if you found yourself in a set of unfortunate circumstances that resulted in a Police Investigation. How would you feel if the investigating Detective chose to ignore all of the other perfectly reasonable explanations that would explain the circumstances you found yourself in, and decided that the ONLY explanation was that you had committed a criminal offence. Sure it's convenient and saves a the Detective involved a lot of that nasty thinking that you have to do when you are obliged by ethics and professionalism to actually consider everything in front of you, not just the explanation that fits in nicely with your personal narrative.
Even if it was leaked with the purpose of trying to influence the outcome, why does that leak have to have come from within SCOTUS at all? Remember Claudia Conway? Or the most boring explanation of all. Unintentional loss of control of a sensitive document.
bigredfish
Known around here
Oh, that's a given with me as well. I've already quit viewing Fox Sports as well, another Murdoch holding, some time ago.
bigredfish
Known around here
Censorship is embraced by the feeble minded, pathetically insecure, and low IQ individuals, who can’t defend their views in factual or reasonable debate.
They are nothing more than petulant emotionally immature children.
(Which accounts for the vast majority of liberal “progressive” Democrats)
www.zerohedge.com
They are nothing more than petulant emotionally immature children.
(Which accounts for the vast majority of liberal “progressive” Democrats)
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Oceanslider
Known around here
+1^^^.Censorship is embraced by the feeble minded, pathetically insecure, and low IQ individuals, who can’t defend their views in factual or reasonable debate.
They are nothing more than petulant emotionally immature children.
(Which accounts for the vast majority of liberal “progressive” Democrats)
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Heck, some outlets/organizations/clubs/cliques/clans/whatever term preaching the Bible as "hate speech."
- In 2004 Sweden passed a "hate speech law" ==>> Criminalizing Christianity: Sweden's Hate Speech Law
- And in Finland, 2022 ==>> Finnish Government Puts Christianity On Trial, Calls The Bible ‘Hate Speech’
- And in the U.S. earlier in 2022 (and my personal fav), ==>> YouTube Labels John MacArthur's Sermon Hate Speech After He Said God Made Us 'Male and Female'