Wasn't Joe a muleskinner circa 1880's or so? Long before he marched for Civil Rights in Selma, AL?
US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
Parley
Known around here
.....and long before Joe was a truckdriver.
bigredfish
Known around here
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Oceanslider
Known around here
link that works?
Must be a firewall or proxy on your side. Here's the literal MP4 file.
View attachment fijCeauPTAlNWyBF32Ce_02_aeaa7d082802c53dd6146eff52c37c6d_video_original.mp4
The Alfa Bank Hoax (Russia, Russia, Russia!) Is Looking A Lot Like Crossfire Hurricane
A lawyer for former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann revealed last week that federal agents never asked Sussmann the origin of the data he provided the FBI related to the Alfa Bank hoax. Beyond highlighting the hackery of the Crossfire Hurricane team, this revelation raises broader concerns about the cozy relationship between the government and private cybersecurity experts.
On Thursday, Sussmann’s Latham and Watkins attorney Michael Bosworth pushed for the dismissal of the special counsel’s criminal case. That case charged Sussmann with lying to former FBI General Counsel James Baker when he provided Baker “white papers” and data ostensibly showing a secret communications channel between the Trump organization and the Russia-connected Alfa Bank. According to the indictment, Sussmann falsely claimed during his meeting with Baker that he was not acting on behalf of a client, when in fact he was working for both the Clinton campaign and tech executive Rodney Joffe.
During last week’s oral argument on Sussmann’s motion to dismiss, Bosworth posited that Sussmann’s allegedly false statement was not “material” to the FBI—and thus not a crime—by arguing that because the FBI never questioned Sussmann on the source of the Alfa Bank information, it was irrelevant to the investigation.
Not once will the evidence show, Bosworth argued, that “anyone at the FBI ever asked Mr. Sussmann, ‘Hey, by the way, where did this information come from?’ No one asked. Not once. Ever.” Sussmann’s attorney continued: “Regardless of who his clients were, if the source of his information was so critical to the government’s investigation, if it mattered so much, you’d think at some point someone would have said, ‘Hey, buddy, you provide this tip to the government. Where did this stuff come from? Who gave it to you? Where did—how did they get it?”
Bosworth’s argument came in response to prosecutor Andrew DeFilippis’s assertion that the special counsel’s office would “put on the stand at trial witnesses who will say that, when you’re analyzing data, you don’t simply close your eyes to where the data came from and compare it to other data or look for corroboration through other sources. The first thing any responsible forensic analysis will ask is ‘Where was the data from?’”
Picking up on Bosworth’s argument, the court interrupted DeFilippis, asking: “If that’s the first thing a responsible investigator would ask, then why would it matter whether Mr. Sussmann was there on behalf of a client or not? Wouldn’t the natural question have been, ‘Where did this stuff come from?’”
DeFilippis responded that because the former FBI general counsel wrongly believed Sussmann had come forward “as a good citizen,” that lulled Baker into accepting the data and white papers without question. Sussmann’s attorney called that argument “nonsensical,” saying that, “if, as the special counsel claims, the first question that investigators would ask is where did the data come from, that’s the question that’s paramount.”
https:/thefederalist.com/2022/04/04/the-alfa-bank-hoax-is-looking-a-lot-like-crossfire-hurricane/
A lawyer for former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann revealed last week that federal agents never asked Sussmann the origin of the data he provided the FBI related to the Alfa Bank hoax. Beyond highlighting the hackery of the Crossfire Hurricane team, this revelation raises broader concerns about the cozy relationship between the government and private cybersecurity experts.
On Thursday, Sussmann’s Latham and Watkins attorney Michael Bosworth pushed for the dismissal of the special counsel’s criminal case. That case charged Sussmann with lying to former FBI General Counsel James Baker when he provided Baker “white papers” and data ostensibly showing a secret communications channel between the Trump organization and the Russia-connected Alfa Bank. According to the indictment, Sussmann falsely claimed during his meeting with Baker that he was not acting on behalf of a client, when in fact he was working for both the Clinton campaign and tech executive Rodney Joffe.
During last week’s oral argument on Sussmann’s motion to dismiss, Bosworth posited that Sussmann’s allegedly false statement was not “material” to the FBI—and thus not a crime—by arguing that because the FBI never questioned Sussmann on the source of the Alfa Bank information, it was irrelevant to the investigation.
Not once will the evidence show, Bosworth argued, that “anyone at the FBI ever asked Mr. Sussmann, ‘Hey, by the way, where did this information come from?’ No one asked. Not once. Ever.” Sussmann’s attorney continued: “Regardless of who his clients were, if the source of his information was so critical to the government’s investigation, if it mattered so much, you’d think at some point someone would have said, ‘Hey, buddy, you provide this tip to the government. Where did this stuff come from? Who gave it to you? Where did—how did they get it?”
Bosworth’s argument came in response to prosecutor Andrew DeFilippis’s assertion that the special counsel’s office would “put on the stand at trial witnesses who will say that, when you’re analyzing data, you don’t simply close your eyes to where the data came from and compare it to other data or look for corroboration through other sources. The first thing any responsible forensic analysis will ask is ‘Where was the data from?’”
Picking up on Bosworth’s argument, the court interrupted DeFilippis, asking: “If that’s the first thing a responsible investigator would ask, then why would it matter whether Mr. Sussmann was there on behalf of a client or not? Wouldn’t the natural question have been, ‘Where did this stuff come from?’”
DeFilippis responded that because the former FBI general counsel wrongly believed Sussmann had come forward “as a good citizen,” that lulled Baker into accepting the data and white papers without question. Sussmann’s attorney called that argument “nonsensical,” saying that, “if, as the special counsel claims, the first question that investigators would ask is where did the data come from, that’s the question that’s paramount.”
https:/thefederalist.com/2022/04/04/the-alfa-bank-hoax-is-looking-a-lot-like-crossfire-hurricane/
Twitter posts, verified as valid on twitter.com, but no corroborating/confirming evidence.
Take it or leave it, it's offered for your consideration.
Take it or leave it, it's offered for your consideration.
libertybiberty
n3wb
Can't imagine why anyone with a brain would believe the GOP lies enough to overpower the obvious Democrat superiority.
You've spent over a decade listening to crap tha doesnt come close to the absolute whale sputum that has come out of the GOP. Not to mention they have done NOTHING in the last 5 years to help ANYONE but themselves and their rich friends.
Good luck meatheads, they'll leave you in the dust as soon as you arent valuable.
F the GOP!
You've spent over a decade listening to crap tha doesnt come close to the absolute whale sputum that has come out of the GOP. Not to mention they have done NOTHING in the last 5 years to help ANYONE but themselves and their rich friends.
Good luck meatheads, they'll leave you in the dust as soon as you arent valuable.
F the GOP!
libertybiberty
n3wb
Good luck meatheads, they'll leave you in the dust as soon as you arent valuable.
F the GOP!
F the GOP!
libertybiberty
n3wb
Like Don Jr isnt a raving coke head----um my dad, um my dad........sniff....
LOL
View attachment don-jr-egqvyiswsaileaw.webp
LOL
View attachment don-jr-egqvyiswsaileaw.webp
Oceanslider
Known around here
^^^
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 14,045
- Reaction score
- 23,390
Good to hear the Russian side .. helps me determine the truth better ..
so far, I'm still using the 95% of the time info from Russia is inaccurate ..
libertybiberty
n3wb
Thank you, thank you! I'll be here all week. Be sure to tip your waitress.
libertybiberty
n3wb
Mkay....
closest I got to a Russian was the one I fucked after a friends wedding in Houston in about oh, 2003ish....
Havent seen her since but she was amaze-balls/
closest I got to a Russian was the one I fucked after a friends wedding in Houston in about oh, 2003ish....
Havent seen her since but she was amaze-balls/
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 14,045
- Reaction score
- 23,390
Easy enough for Russia to accept the jurisdiction from the ICC and call in investigators on any issues ..
Honestly, I have serious doubts about the "all of Azov" is Nazi claims ..
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 14,045
- Reaction score
- 23,390
Pepe Escobar
@RealPepeEscobar
MARIUPOL 1/3
THIS is going to be THE explosive story of the whole 404 saga, not the Bucha false flag.
..
Having a very hard time looking at the evidence and thinking that Pepe Escobar is 100% incorrect about Bucha being a false flag .. as such I believe Pepe is not a truthful source of information ..
Evidence here
Bucha Massacre - Google Drive
drive.google.com
Parley
Known around here
You are one totally confused individual. You are confusing the Biden's with the Trump Family.