US Elections (& Politics) :)

RECAP for todays news

1- DOJ tells Trump he DOES indeed appear in the Epstein files multiple times, but few details.
1A - Judge rules DOJ can NOT open the 2016 Grand Jury files (surprise surprise, there's nothing in there anyway)

2- DNI Tulsi Gabbard lays out "evidence" of wrongdoing by Obama, Clapper, Brennan and others including juicy gossip on Hillary.
Brennan may be caught in a lie to Congress, much of the rest a re-hash of previously known materials and few direct legal gotcha's

3- Rumor that White House will release information on the existence of aliens (not kidding)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: wrapter, Sybertiger, VorlonFrog and 1 other person
There may be some little gas staion in Arkansas selling it today as a special when you buy their fresh sushi for $1.99 but by and large, not even fucking close.

Reminds me of that $1400% discount on drugs he mentioned yesterday...




 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: wrapter, Sybertiger, VorlonFrog and 1 other person
Sybertiger said:
Let's see how worthless the DOJ is when it comes to accountability. We'll probably be reminded that accountability is only for us peasants.

View attachment 225140
Click to expand...



I havent seen a whole lot of new "evidence" that would hold up in court other than Brennan lying to Congress.. just sayin
 
  • Like
Reactions: JNDATHP, wrapter, johnfitz and 1 other person
VorlonFrog said:
Yes, HRC was bat-shit crazy...

Click to expand...



Of course, but then many will testify that I am too.

Problem is, thats not grounds for a criminal conviction

We've been played and Pam Bondi is fucked
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz, Sybertiger and VorlonFrog
Well, if DNI Gabbard's statements this afternoon are all well-documented, the DOJ won't have much work to do.
TulsiGabbard said:
Director Gabbard [White House press conference]: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed tradition tradecraft intelligence community standards, and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election of November of 2016. They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump, and launching what would be a years-long coup against him and his administration.
Click to expand...

1753304348427.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: wrapter, johnfitz, Parley and 1 other person
bigredfish said:
Of course, but then many will testify that I am too.

Problem is, thats not grounds for a criminal conviction
Click to expand...
a) same applies to this old frog, but medication (in my case) works relatively well.
b) and I'm thankful it isn't grounds for a criminal conviction
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: JNDATHP, johnfitz and bigredfish
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
  • Like
Reactions: David L
Supreme Court allows Trump to fire members of product safety agency
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed President Donald Trump to fire members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a federal agency set up by Congress to be independent of political pressures.

The justices, granting an emergency request filed by the Trump administration, blocked a Maryland-based federal judge’s ruling that reinstated Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr., all of whom had been appointed by then-President Joe Biden.

Without the three members in place, the five-member commission would for now lack the necessary quorum to fulfill its obligation to protect consumers from defective products.

Under existing law, members can only be removed for “neglect of duty or malfeasance,” but Trump went ahead and fired members anyway, as he has done at other agencies with similar restrictions as part of his aggressive efforts to reshape the federal government.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JNDATHP, David L and bigredfish
Parley said:
"
I’m sure it did. So did the names of hundreds of others who knew Epstein but did nothing wrong. If there was even a syllable in these files that showed Trump did something wrong it would have been released years ago and repeated a million times."
Click to expand...

Agree. I have no idea if he’s guilty, but he’s at minimum protecting someone
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnfitz
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom