US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Whatever it is he's smoking, it's some GOOD stuff...
www.zerohedge.com
Watch: Biden Claims It's Republicans Who Are "Undermining Our Border Security" | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Poor ole Bobby, hand in the Cookie Jar, got caught again, doing
the same old crap the rest of them do.....
Speaking of a 2 tiered justice system, it ain't just 2! If it were true, why do we live in
a basement and they live at ground level but, there is an elevator with a penthouse
button and a bunch of numbers?
www.zerohedge.com
the same old crap the rest of them do.....
Speaking of a 2 tiered justice system, it ain't just 2! If it were true, why do we live in
a basement and they live at ground level but, there is an elevator with a penthouse
button and a bunch of numbers?
Democrat Sen. Bob Menendez Steps Down As Foreign Relations Chair After Indictment Over Gold Bar And Other Bribery Schemes | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
I'm curious to see if this actually changes anything. It may be mostly symbolic but I would love to see more Dallasites follow his lead.
:focal(0x0:3000x2000)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/f8f21ff957c3cfff8278b5f5ff0fd781/0922%20Eric%20Johnson%20TTF23%20EH%20TT%2006.jpg)
www.texastribune.org
Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson switches to Republican Party
Though the mayor’s position in Dallas is technically nonpartisan, Johnson joins Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker as one of two Republican mayors to lead a major Texas city.
www.texastribune.org
Poor ole Bobby, hand in the Cookie Jar, got caught again, doing
the same old crap the rest of them do.....
Speaking of a 2 tiered justice system, it ain't just 2! If it were true, why do we live in
a basement and they live at ground level but, there is an elevator with a penthouse
button and a bunch of numbers?
Democrat Sen. Bob Menendez Steps Down As Foreign Relations Chair After Indictment Over Gold Bar And Other Bribery Schemes | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Democrat Senator Bob Menendez Indicted for Corruption
A newly unsealed indictment, released today, has revealed an elaborate bribery and corruption scheme orchestrated by New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez and his wife, Nadine Menendez. The allegations: Senator Menendez and his wife “agreed to, and did accept, hundreds of thousands of dollars of...
Oceanslider
Known around here
What is happening at our southern border is insane.
Don't worry self-employed middle class legal Americans, all these single men STREAMING ACROSS THE BORDER won't be looking to put you out of business working under the table off the radar, not having to pay taxes...
The estimate now, under the biden regime, including those not being stopped, is around 15 million by years end.
Don't worry self-employed middle class legal Americans, all these single men STREAMING ACROSS THE BORDER won't be looking to put you out of business working under the table off the radar, not having to pay taxes...
The estimate now, under the biden regime, including those not being stopped, is around 15 million by years end.
Last edited:
Probably killed his chance for reelection.I'm curious to see if this actually changes anything. It may be mostly symbolic but I would love to see more Dallasites follow his lead.
Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson switches to Republican Party
Though the mayor’s position in Dallas is technically nonpartisan, Johnson joins Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker as one of two Republican mayors to lead a major Texas city.
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
(best in full screen)
Oceanslider
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
This will without doubt stop store lootings...
Democratic Mayor Proposes Government-Owned Grocery Store For ‘Racial Justice’ | The Daily Wire
Democratic Mayor Proposes Government-Owned Grocery Store For ‘Racial Justice’ | The Daily Wire
Last edited:
Oceanslider
Known around here
^^^
VOTE BLUE!!!
VOTE BLUE!!!
Last edited:
This had me chuckling...
bigredfish
Known around here
UK Quietly Passes "Online Safety Bill" Into Law
UK Quietly Passes "Online Safety Bill" Into Law | ZeroHedge
Of some note is the “information offenses” clause, which empowers OfCom to demand “information” from users, companies and employees, and makes it a crime to withhold it. The nature of this “information” is never specified, nor does it appear to be qualified. Meaning it could be anything, and will most likely be used to get private account information about users from social media platforms.
In one of the more worrying clauses, the Bill outlines what they call “communications offenses”. Section 10 details crimes of transmitting “Harmful, false and threatening communications”.
It should be noted that sending threats is already illegal in the UK, so the only new ground covered here is “harmful” and/or “false” information, and the fact they feel the need to differentiate between those two things should worry you.
After all, the truth can definitely be “harmful”…Especially to a power-hungry elite barely controlling an angry populace through dishonest propaganda.
Rather amusingly, the bill makes it a crime to “send a message” containing false information in clause 156…then immediately grants immunity to every newspaper, television channel and streaming service in clause 157.
Apparently it’s OK for the mainstream media to be harmful and dishonest.
But the primary purpose of the new law is a transfer of responsibility to enable and incentivize censorship.
Search engines (“regulated search services”, to quote the bill) and social media companies (“regulated user-to-user services”) will now be held accountable for how people use their platform.
For example: If I were to google “Is it safe to drink bleach?”, find some website that says yes, and then drink bleach, OfCom would not hold me responsible. They would hold Google responsible for letting me read that website. Likewise, if someone tweets @ me telling me to drink bleach, and I do so, Twitter would be held responsible for permitting that communication to take place.
This could result in hefty fines, or even potentially criminal charges, to companies and/or executives of those companies. It could even open them up to massively expensive civil suits (don’t be surprised if such a legal drama hits the headlines soon).
Unsurprisingly the mainstream coverage of the new laws barely mentions any of these concerns, instead opting to put child pornography front and centre. Because the Mrs Lovejoy argument always works.
That’s all window dressing, of course, what this is really about is “misinformation” and “hate speech”. Which is to say, fact-checking mainstream lies and calling out mainstream liars.
Section 7(135) is entirely dedicated to the creation of a new “Advisory committee on disinformation and misinformation”, which will be expected to submit regular reports to OfCom and the Secretary of State on how best to “counter misinformation on regulated services“.
This is clearly a response to Covid, or rather the failure of Covid.
Essentially, the pandemic narrative broke because the current mechanisms of censorship didn’t work well enough. In response, the government has just legalised and out-sourced their silencing of dissent.
See, the government isn’t going to actually censor anyone themselves, protecting it from pro-free speech criticism. Rather, huge financial pressure will be applied on tech giants to be “responsible” and “protect the vulnerable”. Meaning de-platforming and cancelling independent media via increasingly opaque “terms of service violations”
These companies will be cheered on by the vast crowd of jabbed-and-masked NPCs who have been so successfully brainwashed into believing the “they are a private company and can do that they want” argument.
This has been going on for years already, of course, but that was covert stuff. Now it’s legal in the UK, and is about to get a lot worse.
It won’t be just the UK either, considering the messaging on “misinformation” being seen at the UN in the last few days, we should expect something similar on a global scale.
UK Quietly Passes "Online Safety Bill" Into Law | ZeroHedge
Of some note is the “information offenses” clause, which empowers OfCom to demand “information” from users, companies and employees, and makes it a crime to withhold it. The nature of this “information” is never specified, nor does it appear to be qualified. Meaning it could be anything, and will most likely be used to get private account information about users from social media platforms.
In one of the more worrying clauses, the Bill outlines what they call “communications offenses”. Section 10 details crimes of transmitting “Harmful, false and threatening communications”.
It should be noted that sending threats is already illegal in the UK, so the only new ground covered here is “harmful” and/or “false” information, and the fact they feel the need to differentiate between those two things should worry you.
After all, the truth can definitely be “harmful”…Especially to a power-hungry elite barely controlling an angry populace through dishonest propaganda.
Rather amusingly, the bill makes it a crime to “send a message” containing false information in clause 156…then immediately grants immunity to every newspaper, television channel and streaming service in clause 157.
Apparently it’s OK for the mainstream media to be harmful and dishonest.
But the primary purpose of the new law is a transfer of responsibility to enable and incentivize censorship.
Search engines (“regulated search services”, to quote the bill) and social media companies (“regulated user-to-user services”) will now be held accountable for how people use their platform.
For example: If I were to google “Is it safe to drink bleach?”, find some website that says yes, and then drink bleach, OfCom would not hold me responsible. They would hold Google responsible for letting me read that website. Likewise, if someone tweets @ me telling me to drink bleach, and I do so, Twitter would be held responsible for permitting that communication to take place.
This could result in hefty fines, or even potentially criminal charges, to companies and/or executives of those companies. It could even open them up to massively expensive civil suits (don’t be surprised if such a legal drama hits the headlines soon).
Unsurprisingly the mainstream coverage of the new laws barely mentions any of these concerns, instead opting to put child pornography front and centre. Because the Mrs Lovejoy argument always works.
That’s all window dressing, of course, what this is really about is “misinformation” and “hate speech”. Which is to say, fact-checking mainstream lies and calling out mainstream liars.
Section 7(135) is entirely dedicated to the creation of a new “Advisory committee on disinformation and misinformation”, which will be expected to submit regular reports to OfCom and the Secretary of State on how best to “counter misinformation on regulated services“.
This is clearly a response to Covid, or rather the failure of Covid.
Essentially, the pandemic narrative broke because the current mechanisms of censorship didn’t work well enough. In response, the government has just legalised and out-sourced their silencing of dissent.
See, the government isn’t going to actually censor anyone themselves, protecting it from pro-free speech criticism. Rather, huge financial pressure will be applied on tech giants to be “responsible” and “protect the vulnerable”. Meaning de-platforming and cancelling independent media via increasingly opaque “terms of service violations”
These companies will be cheered on by the vast crowd of jabbed-and-masked NPCs who have been so successfully brainwashed into believing the “they are a private company and can do that they want” argument.
This has been going on for years already, of course, but that was covert stuff. Now it’s legal in the UK, and is about to get a lot worse.
It won’t be just the UK either, considering the messaging on “misinformation” being seen at the UN in the last few days, we should expect something similar on a global scale.
bigredfish
Known around here
Good interview with Tucker. I didnt consider it "bombshell: but good.
"Our System Is Collapsing In Real Time": Tucker Carlson Gives Bombshell Interview
"Our System Is Collapsing In Real Time": Tucker Carlson Gives Bombshell Interview | ZeroHedge
"Our System Is Collapsing In Real Time": Tucker Carlson Gives Bombshell Interview
"Our System Is Collapsing In Real Time": Tucker Carlson Gives Bombshell Interview | ZeroHedge
Sybertiger
Known around here
And 42% of the voting public isn't paying attention.
www.foxnews.com
Trump runs away with double-digit lead over Biden, new general election poll finds
President Biden's White House was hit with a dire poll on Sunday, with the Washington Post and ABC showing former President Trump leading Biden by 10 points.
www.foxnews.com
Tucker sums up today's MSM:
I meant what I said. I've worked at a lot of news organizations in the United States, and they're all the same. They're all afraid of getting sued or yelled at or fired or humiliated. But interestingly, none of them are very afraid of getting things wrong. That's not a concern. They're not worried about accuracy as much as they're worried about being unfashionable or saying something forbidden. What they're really worried about is telling the truth.
You'd think that if you ran a news organization, your main concern would be getting it right and that you'd be terrified if someone would make a mistake. But that's not their top concern. And not just at Fox. I worked at MSNBC and CNN. I worked at PBS. I spent a year working at ABC. I've certainly been around a lot of news companies, and they're all the same. They're all fearful people who are making more than they probably should be, and they're worried about losing their jobs. Occasionally, you'll find a courageous person, but they are very, very, very rare. Very rare.
Oceanslider
Known around here
Pretty much the left in a nutshell in this era. All these Western countries falling. the UK is already putting people in jail for disagreeing with the cult of transgenderism. This will just make it worse.
as she says (if you don't echo our narrative, then off to jail you go)
"“Today is a major milestone in the mission to create a safer life online for children and adults in the UK. Everyone at Ofcom feels privileged to be entrusted with this important role, and we’re ready to start implementing these new laws.” "
Ofcom boss: 'Inappropriate' to balance trans people with anti-trans activists (thepinknews.com)
If you only believe in Man and Woman you are labeled "Transphobic"
Last edited: