Small and quiet PC for Blue Iris?

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,902
Reaction score
21,274
Good point. I already have 2 indoor Hik cubes that I'll keep on the system, and I think I want to add 2-3 outdoor 4MP turrets. Oh, and also a doorbell that works with Blue Iris. So, maybe around 6 cameras?
That is a very low load (note the number of cameras is irrelevant, is the total MP/s which is total resolution x fps). You can easily run it with lots of room to spare on this i5-6500 for 140. Note that while it says no OS, all you need to do is use the free MS media creation tool to install w10 pro. You wont need a license key as its tied to the motherboard.
There is no good cheap doorbell period. If you want to spend 700-800 look at the axis doorbell.
 
As an eBay Associate IPCamTalk earns from qualifying purchases.
Joined
May 1, 2019
Messages
2,215
Reaction score
3,504
Location
Reno, NV
I followed @fenderman 's, Blue Iris Cliff Notes, and other member's advice when I initially built my blue iris machine. Helped greatly to get on my feet. One thing to consider is your real estate available. At first, I purchased a $200 i7-4770 cpu Windows 10 mid-sized tower off eBay and it worked super great, but does take up space. At that time, it was not a concern as it sat on a shelf. However, later on, I installed a wall mounted networking cabinet and real estate quickly turned into an issue. Foolishly, I purchased a i7-4770 USFF (ultra small form factor) which does not allow 3.5" hard drives (Western Digital Purple for surveillance recordings only come in 3.5", not 2.5"). I opted to save all my new/stored recordings to my Synology NAS for 15 continuous 24/7 cameras. Which presented other problems that I didnt like. In the end (hopefully), after feeling comfortable knowing what hardware is happy for surveillance / blue iris purposes, I built my own server case.
Moral of the story... mid-size tower takes up lots of space. USFF is too small if using 3.5" hard drives. SFF (small form factor) cases might just be right even if the CPU for smaller cases are a little slower than big cases, or after a time of you knowing pro's/con's of hardware, your own server case.
 
Last edited:

dabflyboy

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
86
Reaction score
61
Location
USA
I followed @fenderman 's, Blue Iris Cliff Notes, and other member's advice when I initially built my blue iris machine. Helped greatly to get on my feet. One thing to consider is your real estate available. At first, I purchased a $200 i7-4770 cpu Windows 10 mid-sized tower off eBay and it worked super great, but does take up space. At that time, it was not a concern as it sat on a shelf. However, later on, I installed a wall mounted networking cabinet and real estate quickly turned into an issue. Foolishly, I purchased a i7-4770 USFF (ultra small form factor) which does not allow 3.5" hard drives (Western Digital Purple for surveillance recordings only come in 3.5", not 2.5"). I opted to save all my new/stored recordings to my Synology NAS for 15 continuous 24/7 cameras. Which presented other problems that I didnt like. In the end (hopefully), after feeling comfortable knowing what hardware is happy for surveillance / blue iris purposes, I built my own server case.
Moral of the story... mid-size tower takes up lots of space. USFF is too small if using 3.5" hard drives. SFF (small form factor) cases might just be right even if the CPU for smaller cases are a little slower than big cases, or after a time of you knowing pro's/con's of hardware, your own server case.
@Holbs Did you eventually get something like a SFF, instead of the USFF?
 

dabflyboy

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
86
Reaction score
61
Location
USA

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,902
Reaction score
21,274
I followed @fenderman 's, Blue Iris Cliff Notes, and other member's advice when I initially built my blue iris machine. Helped greatly to get on my feet. One thing to consider is your real estate available. At first, I purchased a $200 i7-4770 cpu Windows 10 mid-sized tower off eBay and it worked super great, but does take up space. At that time, it was not a concern as it sat on a shelf. However, later on, I installed a wall mounted networking cabinet and real estate quickly turned into an issue. Foolishly, I purchased a i7-4770 USFF (ultra small form factor) which does not allow 3.5" hard drives (Western Digital Purple for surveillance recordings only come in 3.5", not 2.5"). I opted to save all my new/stored recordings to my Synology NAS for 15 continuous 24/7 cameras. Which presented other problems that I didnt like. In the end (hopefully), after feeling comfortable knowing what hardware is happy for surveillance / blue iris purposes, I built my own server case.
Moral of the story... mid-size tower takes up lots of space. USFF is too small if using 3.5" hard drives. SFF (small form factor) cases might just be right even if the CPU for smaller cases are a little slower than big cases, or after a time of you knowing pro's/con's of hardware, your own server case.
Note SFF's use full desktop intel cpu's. Its is only the smaller USDT that uses the low powered cpu.
 

dabflyboy

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
86
Reaction score
61
Location
USA
Note SFF's use full desktop intel cpu's. Its is only the smaller USDT that uses the low powered cpu.
Yeah, that's what I've been seeing as I keep researching. BTW, when you asked what kind of load I expect to put on the system, what I meant in my reply is that those cameras are what I would like to start out with, definitely not the final product. There are just some coverage areas that are more of a priority than others, at the moment.
 
Last edited:

NASSY

n3wb
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Location
Germany
Hi guys! I'll just re-use this thread as I found it while searching on Google for answers to a similar question: I am looking for a PC, that is small AND low on power consumption to run Blue Iris. Is this too much asked for or are there any options? Are there any good alternatives to the Intel NUCs? I find them a bit expensive for what they are offering hardware-wise. I am about to run 4-6 IP cams with it.

I have some good knowledge on assembling PCs, so there is no limitation on already assembled PCs by the manufacturer (I guess here I can relate on this: Choosing Hardware for Blue Iris, but unfortunately the variety doesn't consider power consumption).

Too much power consumption means: > 50 Watt. I would prefer sth. comparable to the Synology NAS, about 20 Watt max. including hard drives.

I live in Germany and the energy prices here are the highest in Europe: about 0,30€ per kWh. So any saving on power consumption is good, also for the environment.

I appreciate any suggestion!

Thanks and best regards!
 

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,633
Reaction score
22,880
Location
Evansville, In. USA
Hi guys! I'll just re-use this thread as I found it while searching on Google for answers to a similar question: I am looking for a PC, that is small AND low on power consumption to run Blue Iris. Is this too much asked for or are there any options? Are there any good alternatives to the Intel NUCs? I find them a bit expensive for what they are offering hardware-wise. I am about to run 4-6 IP cams with it.

I have some good knowledge on assembling PCs, so there is no limitation on already assembled PCs by the manufacturer (I guess here I can relate on this: Choosing Hardware for Blue Iris, but unfortunately the variety doesn't consider power consumption).

Too much power consumption means: > 50 Watt. I would prefer sth. comparable to the Synology NAS, about 20 Watt max. including hard drives.

I live in Germany and the energy prices here are the highest in Europe: about 0,30€ per kWh. So any saving on power consumption is good, also for the environment.

I appreciate any suggestion!

Thanks and best regards!
My Dell Optiplex SFF I7-7700, use's on average 25 watts.
 

IReallyLikePizza2

Known around here
Joined
May 14, 2019
Messages
1,852
Reaction score
4,443
Location
Houston
If you intend to build out a new system, go for a mini-ITX foam factor
Honestly I would disagree

I fell into the Mini ITX Trap too many times. Yeah they are nice and small, but they limit you way too much on upgradability. Unless you live in a small apartment with no space, I see no reason not to go with Micro-ATX at the very least
 

Arjun

Known around here
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
9,118
Reaction score
11,160
Location
USA
I should have retracted that statement, I tried the mini-ITX, went back to full ATX :rofl: Obviously that was posted a while ago


Honestly I would disagree

I fell into the Mini ITX Trap too many times. Yeah they are nice and small, but they limit you way too much on upgradability. Unless you live in a small apartment with no space, I see no reason not to go with Micro-ATX at the very least
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
852
Location
Colorado
Honestly I would disagree


Just joking, but mini-itx for something you don't need a lot of expansion slots wouldn't concern me, and you probably don't need more than 2 memory slots etc.

Just get the cheapest somewhat close to current gen used desktop like the guide says. It might be a little tough right now, at least in the USA it is, to get decent computer stuff but with Intel that has built-in graphics and substreams to lower CPU usage you will be sipping power if you get relatively recent generation stuff.
 
Last edited:
Top