Hello ️
i just jump right to the problem:
We live in an apartment building with multiple households, and we want to install cameras to monitor the entrance and the basement areas , all inside the building, in the shared hallways.
All residents and the landlord are okay with having cameras and temporarily storing the footage locally.
One issue: the ceilings are very low, so anyone could easily reach up and grab or damage the cameras. That’s why I don’t want the footage to be stored on an SD card inside the cameras themselves. I’d prefer an external storage option , something safer, like a hub or base station that stores the video separately.
I’ve been looking into budget solutions, and here’s what I had in mind:
We place cameras in the hallways and basement, and they all connect wirelessly to a hub, which is stored in one of the apartments (as long as it's within range of the cameras).
The hub is then connected to a small standalone router, so no one needs to share access to their private internet (i want every household to be able to look at the camera footage).
I’ve read that some systems — like Eufy, for example — require an internet connection to access the footage or to verify users.
But what I actually want is a setup where each resident can access the footage stored on the hub — ideally by connecting to the hub locally (e.g., with their smartphones) over the mini router’s Wi-Fi, without needing internet.
I also came across i.e. Tapo C420 camera, which seems to offer decent image quality for the price. However, I read in a forum that the range is not very good, especially when there are walls between the camera and the hub — which could be a problem in a multi-floor building like ours.
My question:
Is this kind of setup possible in a budget version?
Can the hub and cameras work without a constant internet connection, and still let multiple residents connect locally to view the stored footage?
Also:
Is this kind of setup suitable, or are there easier and more straightforward solutions?
I know there are standalone systems that might handle this better, but they tend to be more expensive — and we're trying to stay within a reasonable budget.
Thanks a lot in advance!
i just jump right to the problem:
We live in an apartment building with multiple households, and we want to install cameras to monitor the entrance and the basement areas , all inside the building, in the shared hallways.
All residents and the landlord are okay with having cameras and temporarily storing the footage locally.
One issue: the ceilings are very low, so anyone could easily reach up and grab or damage the cameras. That’s why I don’t want the footage to be stored on an SD card inside the cameras themselves. I’d prefer an external storage option , something safer, like a hub or base station that stores the video separately.
I’ve been looking into budget solutions, and here’s what I had in mind:
We place cameras in the hallways and basement, and they all connect wirelessly to a hub, which is stored in one of the apartments (as long as it's within range of the cameras).
The hub is then connected to a small standalone router, so no one needs to share access to their private internet (i want every household to be able to look at the camera footage).
I’ve read that some systems — like Eufy, for example — require an internet connection to access the footage or to verify users.
But what I actually want is a setup where each resident can access the footage stored on the hub — ideally by connecting to the hub locally (e.g., with their smartphones) over the mini router’s Wi-Fi, without needing internet.
I also came across i.e. Tapo C420 camera, which seems to offer decent image quality for the price. However, I read in a forum that the range is not very good, especially when there are walls between the camera and the hub — which could be a problem in a multi-floor building like ours.
My question:
Is this kind of setup possible in a budget version?
Can the hub and cameras work without a constant internet connection, and still let multiple residents connect locally to view the stored footage?
Also:
Is this kind of setup suitable, or are there easier and more straightforward solutions?
I know there are standalone systems that might handle this better, but they tend to be more expensive — and we're trying to stay within a reasonable budget.
Thanks a lot in advance!