Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

[tigerwillow1]

New CDC Data Shows Covid Shot Myocarditis Concerns Are Legit

The CDC's latest numbers about post-vax myocarditis represent a significant departure from last year's narrative.

thefederalist.com

There is a huge flaw in this article:
"the media can no longer deny that what they called misinformation actually has data to back it up"

I'm not seeing any change in in the media's narrative, or any admission that they ever falsely labeled anything as misinformation. They're still pushing "safe and effective", and anything to the contrary is conspiracy theory and/or misinformation.

 

[bigredfish]

Same as certain members parroting the same crap?

 

[David L]

I know I have been sharing Russell a lot lately but I like to watch someone come to The Truth since more and more Data is being released...

 

[Gargoile]

Reminds me of the doctor medic shooting syringes on Team fortress game back 20 yrs ago.
View attachment 139366

I miss TF, and those damn respawn campers

 

[David L]

I miss TF, and those damn respawn campers

I play TF2 every once in awhile. It is the only free game I like...

 

[tech_junkie]

Let's see. We have a vaccine that isn't actually a vaccine and doesn't prevent infection or the spread of that same infection. Now we have a booster that doesn't stop the infection or spread of the infection. We've been harangued by "experts" telling us how effective both the vaccine and the boosters are while they're totally ineffective against the virus that they were specifically designed for. Now, on top of the blood clotting problems and the general death rate increases, data is indicating an even higher death rate for those that get infected after they have receive the booster shots.

Am I the only one that thinks this is a total sham? Nahh, it couldn't be, everything is fine, just ask the experts.

Its deliberate. However, the reasons why they are doing it is not for the same reasons why the scenario was created in the first place. I know why because I'm the one of the authors of it. And it wasn't suppose to last as long as they stretched it out till one of the co-wagers waged war in the Ukraine. Did you noticed the propaganda machine magically stopped their mental bio-terrorism attack to focus on that war engagement?

Those pool of "experts" have been selected from only one part of the original pandemic response system the US originally had which was balanced out by DOD. The medical industry had reps and the defense department had reps that together was a committee to convey and apply solutions. The surgeon general then communicates to the public what they should do in their parts of pandemic response. Most of pandemic response is personal and public hygiene, as well as applying decontamination practices as well as establishing healthy practices and curtailing any source of possible pathogenic infection including food safety and water sources.

The DOD usually leads pandemic response, but the politicians changed that and in their bad decision set up the medical industry to commit weaponized medicine on a global scale. Because the medical industry thinks a shot or a pill can solve it and since these things are judged by actions, it seems they were not interested into promoting prevention methods by other means that work but marketing some drug to sell. Which eventually an international court will review all of their actions.

Water sources can not be trusted right now, as evidence of Polio outbreaks and the biggest cause of it has always been in modern times, a breakdown of water reclamation systems and pollution of waterways. When this is deliberate, this would be a biological warfare attack. Some people have the misconception that biological warfare attacks involve something mist into the air. But that is only one form of attack. I know, I was a biological warfare specialist in the USAF.

The examination mask was applied as a bio terrorism weapon. Would you like to know how I came up with that assessment?

 

[Parley]

Ivermectin reduces COVID death risk by 92%, peer-reviewed study finds

A new peer-reviewed study found that regular use of ivermectin reduced the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 92%.

The large study was conducted by Flávio A. Cadegiani, MD, MSc, PhD. Cadegiani is a board-certified endocrinologist with a master's degree and doctorate degree in clinical endocrinology.

The peer-reviewed study was published on Wednesday by the online medical journal Cureus. The study was conducted on a strictly controlled population of 88,012 people from the city of Itajaí in Brazil.

Individuals who used ivermectin as prophylaxis or took the medication before being infected by COVID experienced significant reductions in death and hospitalization.

According to the study, those who took ivermectin regularly had a 92% reduction in their COVID death risk compared to non-users and 84% less than irregular users.

"The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users," the study stated.

The impressive reduction for regular ivermectin users was evident despite the regular users being at a higher risk for COVID deaths. The regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.

New peer-reviewed study finds ivermectin reduces covid deaths by 92% - TheBlaze

 

[bigredfish]

Doctors, Scientists and Professionals from More than 34 Countries Declare "International Medical Crisis" due to Diseases and Deaths Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Around 403 doctors, scientists, and professionals from more than 34 countries declared that there is an international medical crisis due to the diseases and deaths following the administration of products known as “COVID-19 vaccines,” according to James Roguski Substack.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Around 403 doctors, scientists, and professionals from more than 34 countries declared that there is an international medical crisis due to the diseases and deaths following the administration of products known as “COVID-19 vaccines,” according to James Roguski Substack.

“We are currently witnessing an excess in mortality in those countries where the majority of the population has received the so-called “COVID-19 vaccines,” according to the news release. “To date, this excess mortality has neither been sufficiently investigated nor studied by national and international health institutions.”

..........
Examining the reports on CDC’s VAERS, the UK’s Yellow Card System, the Australian Adverse Event Monitoring System, Europe’s EudraVigilance System and the WHO’s VigiAccess Database, to date there have been more than 11 million reports of adverse effects and more than 70,000 deaths co-related to the inoculation of the products known as “covid vaccines”.
We know that these numbers just about represent between 1% and 10% of all real events.

 

[Parley]

"is an international medical crisis due to the diseases and deaths following the administration of products known as “COVID-19 vaccines,” according to James Roguski Substack."

Meanwhile the Biden Administration is pushing for more COVID-19 booster shots.

 

[Arjun]

The governor's declaration came the same day local authorities on Long Island said recent testing of wastewater in Nassau County turned up positive traces of the polio virus. That county joins Rockland, Orange and Sullivan in detecting the virus in sewage samples.

NY Declares Polio Emergency as Another County Finds Virus in Wastewater

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul declared a state of emergency on Friday as yet another county announced detection of the virus in wastewater samples, a sign the outbreak continues to spread throughout the Empire State. The governor’s declaration came the same day local authorities on Long Island said...

www.nbcnewyork.com

 

[Parley]

Speech therapist reveals she's been inundated with wave of 'COVID babies' who can barely SPEAK because of pandemic shutdowns - and parents are paying up to $1,000 a month to repair the damage
Daily Mail ^

The phenomenon, speech pathologist Nancy Polow says, is part of a concerning trend in kids born during or shortly before the pandemic Compounding the crisis, when parents sought help, they were met with lockdown-related roadblocks, such as mask restrictions and telehealth meetings Now the restrictions have lessened, Polow says, parents are scrambling to address these failures, signing up for pricey speech therapy sessions A growing body of academic research also supports Polow's claim that children born over the past three or so years possessing weaker verbal skills

Therapist says she's seen influx of 'COVID babies' who haven't hit milestones and can barely speak | Daily Mail Online

 

[tech_junkie]

Ivermectin reduces COVID death risk by 92%, peer-reviewed study finds

A new peer-reviewed study found that regular use of ivermectin reduced the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 92%.

Ivermectin is an anti bacterial. It would not kill the corona but it will kill the rhino as well as bacterial influenza and phuemonia which all of these would show up as positive indication on a covid test because their tests they have are "general cold and flu" tests and any swab test for a covid of any kind is inconclusive. This is why when someone tests positive on a swab HIV (covid-23) test they take their blood.

When Ivermectin is subscribed by pandemic response, it is because there is evidence of water pollution that is causing bacterial infections. Since there is no biological warfare specialists tasked to monitor water sources, they could be bacterial contaminated which can cause the same symptoms as the flu. Hence why I have to naturally assume that they are polluted and the only good sources of water to drink and cook with is bottled water and water that is distilled. I purchased a 1 Gal distiller just because of this. But I find that my coffee and things I cook with tastes better than when I go and get the same thing prepared in public.

 

[Oceanslider]

Ivermectin reduces COVID death risk by 92%, peer-reviewed study finds

A new peer-reviewed study found that regular use of ivermectin reduced the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 92%.

The large study was conducted by Flávio A. Cadegiani, MD, MSc, PhD. Cadegiani is a board-certified endocrinologist with a master's degree and doctorate degree in clinical endocrinology.

The peer-reviewed study was published on Wednesday by the online medical journal Cureus. The study was conducted on a strictly controlled population of 88,012 people from the city of Itajaí in Brazil.

Individuals who used ivermectin as prophylaxis or took the medication before being infected by COVID experienced significant reductions in death and hospitalization.

According to the study, those who took ivermectin regularly had a 92% reduction in their COVID death risk compared to non-users and 84% less than irregular users.

"The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users," the study stated.

The impressive reduction for regular ivermectin users was evident despite the regular users being at a higher risk for COVID deaths. The regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.

New peer-reviewed study finds ivermectin reduces covid deaths by 92% - TheBlaze

Got to love the deep state experts, not
New peer-reviewed study finds ivermectin reduces covid deaths by 92% - TheBlaze
"The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users," the study stated.

 

[bigredfish]

“Ethically Unjustifiable” – Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus

"Ethically Unjustifiable" - Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus

A new pre-print study by nine health experts from major universities showed that the COVID-19 vaccines are 98 times worse than the virus, and mandatory booster vaccination in college is “ethically unjustifiable,” as reported by Epoch Times.

The study was posted on The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) in September, titled, “COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities.“

It was conducted by nine top scientists from the University of Washington, University of Oxford, University of Toronto, Harvard University – Harvard Medical School, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Johns Hopkins University – Department of Surgery, and others.

Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, researchers conclude that booster regulations may result in more harm than good.

According to the study, for every one COVID hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, “18 to 98 actual serious adverse events” have been caused.

“Per COVID-19 hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities,” the study stated.


University booster mandates were deemed unethical by the researchers for the following reasons:

• no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group;
• vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
• mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
• US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and
• mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialization and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support.

The study concludes:

Based on public data provided by the CDC, we estimate that approximately 22,000 to 30,000 previous uninfected young adults ages 18–29 years must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation. Given the fact that this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by prior infection nor a risk-adjustment for comorbidity status this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit.
Our estimate shows that university Covid-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—between 18 and 98 serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation and 1373 to 3234 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit.
Advertisement - story continues below

Serious Covid-19 vaccine-associated harms are not adequately compensated for by current US vaccine injury systems. As such, these severe infringements of individual liberty are ethically unjustifiable.

Worse still, mandates are associated with wider social harms. The fact that such policies were implemented despite controversy among experts and without updating the sole publicly available risk-benefit analysis to the current Omicron variants suggests a profound lack of transparency in scientific and regulatory policy making.

These findings have implications for mandates in other settings such as schools, corporations, healthcare systems and the military. Policymakers should repeal booster mandates for young adults immediately, ensure pathways to compensation to those who have suffered negative consequences from these policies, provide open access to participant-level clinical trial data to allow risk- and age-stratified harm-benefit analyses of any new vaccines prior to issuing recommendations125, and begin what will be a long process of rebuilding trust in public health

You can read and download the study here

 

[Gargoile]

More…

'Never Seen' Before: Embalmers Finding Long, Rubbery Clots Inside Corpses Since Implementation of Covid Vaccines | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Embalmers are finding long, rubbery clots inside of corpses since the implementation of Covid vaccines.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I would like to know what the blood type is of the people that the morticians removed this from. Could there be a common link to a specific blood type?

 

[gwminor48]

Big tech seems to have loosened their stranglehold and are allowing some info to get out about all the damage from the covid shots. I don't think it's an accident, maybe they have a plan to blame it all on Trump for rushing these "vaccines" out?

 

[bigredfish]

So the FDA gives a big Fuck You to the public .... again.

Shut up and eat your bugs!


FDA Refuses To Provide Key COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Analyses
FDA Refuses To Provide Key COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Analyses | ZeroHedge

U.S. drug regulators are refusing to provide key analyses of a COVID-19 vaccine safety database, claiming that the factual findings cannot be separated by internal discussions protected by law.

A sign for the Food And Drug Administration outside of the headquarters in White Oak, Md., on July 20, 2020. (Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images)

The Epoch Times asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July for all analyses performed by the agency for the COVID-19 vaccines using a method called Empirical Bayesian data mining, which involves comparing the adverse events recorded after a specific COVID-19 vaccine with those recorded after vaccination with non-COVID-19 vaccines.

According to operating procedures laid out by the agency and its partner in January 2021 and February 2022, the FDA would perform data mining “at least biweekly” to identify adverse events “reported more frequently than expected following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines.” The agency would perform the mining on data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

In a recent response, the FDA records office told The Epoch Times that it would not provide any of the analyses, even in redacted form.
The agency cited an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act that lets the government withhold inter-agency and intra-agency memorandums and letters “that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency.”
The agency also pointed to the Code of Federal Regulations, which says that “all communications within the Executive Branch of the Federal government which are in written form or which are subsequently reduced to writing may be withheld from public disclosure except that factual information which is reasonably segregable in accordance with the rule established in § 20.22 is available for public disclosure.”

It’s not clear why the FDA could not produce copies of the analyses with non-factual information redacted. The Epoch Times has appealed the determination by the records office. The FDA declined to comment, citing the appeal

 

[David L]

So the FDA gives a big Fuck You to the public .... again.

Shut up and eat your bugs!


FDA Refuses To Provide Key COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Analyses
FDA Refuses To Provide Key COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Analyses | ZeroHedge

U.S. drug regulators are refusing to provide key analyses of a COVID-19 vaccine safety database, claiming that the factual findings cannot be separated by internal discussions protected by law.

A sign for the Food And Drug Administration outside of the headquarters in White Oak, Md., on July 20, 2020. (Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images)

The Epoch Times asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July for all analyses performed by the agency for the COVID-19 vaccines using a method called Empirical Bayesian data mining, which involves comparing the adverse events recorded after a specific COVID-19 vaccine with those recorded after vaccination with non-COVID-19 vaccines.

According to operating procedures laid out by the agency and its partner in January 2021 and February 2022, the FDA would perform data mining “at least biweekly” to identify adverse events “reported more frequently than expected following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines.” The agency would perform the mining on data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

In a recent response, the FDA records office told The Epoch Times that it would not provide any of the analyses, even in redacted form.
The agency cited an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act that lets the government withhold inter-agency and intra-agency memorandums and letters “that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency.”
The agency also pointed to the Code of Federal Regulations, which says that “all communications within the Executive Branch of the Federal government which are in written form or which are subsequently reduced to writing may be withheld from public disclosure except that factual information which is reasonably segregable in accordance with the rule established in § 20.22 is available for public disclosure.”

It’s not clear why the FDA could not produce copies of the analyses with non-factual information redacted. The Epoch Times has appealed the determination by the records office. The FDA declined to comment, citing the appeal

It is for this reason and many others that I don't trust the Clot Shot...

 

[bigredfish]

Like most of our rogue government, They Know, and they know We know, And they simply dont give a shit.

Because 50%+ of the population is either too fucking stupid to care, or feel better about their pathetic fake lives by ignoring it.

 

[David L]