Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

David L

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
8,139
Reaction score
21,293
Location
USA
CDC reports the number toward the bottom of the page, after they have repeatedly said that the vaccines are perfectly safe. They hope you won't read far enough to see how full of shit they are. Every one of the 7,218 dead persons will remain deceased forever.


View attachment 100712
  • Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. More than 369 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through August 30, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 7,218 reports of death (0.0020%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. However, recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and TTS, a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths pdf icon[1.4 MB, 40 pages].
 

SouthernYankee

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Messages
5,170
Reaction score
5,320
Location
Houston Tx
That is VAERS Vaccine Adverse event report system.

I like that way it is posted with 7218 dead from 369 million doses. with .0020% death rate.
7218/369000000 = 0.00001956097 or about 0.0020%.
But most people had two shots it is about 0.0040% per person that had the mRNA double shot. Now we need a booster shot, so it is 0.0060% . With each booster shot our chances of dying from it go up..... NICE :)
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,722
Reaction score
49,307
Location
Floriduh
It’s always easy to sort out when you follow the money…

——————
NPR writes this, "Poison control centers are seeing a dramatic surge in calls from people who are self-medicating with ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug for animals..."

On the contrary, Ivermectin is used every day for scabies and is not confined to animals any more than penicillin is purely an animal antibiotic.

We are asked to believe that six telephone calls to poison control about Ivermectin are somehow newsworthy, yet over 100,000 calls to poison control on Tylenol each year are not. Moreover, no one dies of Ivermectin in a typical year, yet Tylenol accounts for 56,000 annual emergency room visits, 2,600 hospitalizations, and almost 500 deaths.

Acetaminophen and the U.S. Acute Liver Failure Study Group: lowering the risks of hepatic failure - PubMed

The fact that Ivermectin is so much SAFER than over-the-counter Tylenol should make you wonder exactly why these articles made the news. The reason is simple. Pfizer and Merck are getting ready to launch expensive new anti-viral pills that can provide early outpatient treatment for COVID-19 and perhaps even be used preventatively. Yet Ivermectin remains effective, cheap, and safe and thus poses a HUGE threat to their profits.
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,722
Reaction score
49,307
Location
Floriduh
The regime and its blue pill followers are about to roll out the next phase of their Big Lie.

White House Signals New COVID-19 Measures Coming For People Who Are Unvaccinated | ZeroHedge
"Ahead of President Joe Biden’s announcement Thursday about new COVID-19 measures, White House press secretary slut Jen (I'll blow anyone for a job) Psaki said that there may be new measures that will be imposed on unvaccinated people.
“There are six steps the president’s announcing, there will be new components,” Psaki told reporters on Wednesday.
“Some of that will be related to access to testing, some will be related to mandates, some will be related to how we ensure kids will be protected in schools.”
When asked about how the new steps would impact Americans’ lives, Psaki said that “it depends on if you’re vaccinated or not.”




We'll have to tune in tomorrow to see what they wrote for the liberal piece of shit dementia patient to recite. They wont stop pushing because they know more and more of the vaxxed are catching it and being hospitalized for it and their "vaccine" doesnt work. They have to push before the real numbers reach the brain dead segment of the population. Question is how big a bite are they willing to take? Might be time to prepare..
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
17,722
Reaction score
49,307
Location
Floriduh
New Zealand has surpassed even Australia in total capitulation to their masters.
Apparently there is no longer anyone left there (well except for the guy who escaped the internment camp) that cares about their freedom or has a pair of balls left.

Bread and circuses…


 

tigerwillow1

Known around here
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
3,864
Reaction score
8,573
Location
USA, Oregon
Here's another phony salvo in the war on ivermectin.

Ivermectin causes sterilization in 85 percent of men, study finds

"The study conducted by researchers in Nigeria screened 385 patients with river blindness to investigate the effects of Ivermectin on sperm function."

The article neglects to mention that the screening rejected most of the study candidates and only 37 were included in the study. There was no control group, and I don't see any consideration that maybe the issue was caused by the river blindness and not the ivermectin. The study says absolutely nothing about sterilization. Zero. It notes a "significant" drop in sperm count of 16% (!), and a "significant" drop of sperm mobility and increase of abnormalities.

"Sterilization" is a false claim!
"85% of men" is a false claim!

Other than those 2 details, the headline might be ok. I wonder if this will be all over the MSM in a couple of days?
 

David L

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
8,139
Reaction score
21,293
Location
USA
Here's another phony salvo in the war on ivermectin.

Ivermectin causes sterilization in 85 percent of men, study finds

"The study conducted by researchers in Nigeria screened 385 patients with river blindness to investigate the effects of Ivermectin on sperm function."

The article neglects to mention that the screening rejected most of the study candidates and only 37 were included in the study. There was no control group, and I don't see any consideration that maybe the issue was caused by the river blindness and not the ivermectin. The study says absolutely nothing about sterilization. Zero. It notes a "significant" drop in sperm count of 16% (!), and a "significant" drop of sperm mobility and increase of abnormalities.

"Sterilization" is a false claim!
"85% of men" is a false claim!

Other than those 2 details, the headline might be ok. I wonder if this will be all over the MSM in a couple of days?
Shoot at might age, pretty sure I am already Steril, LOL

Plus isn't that what the Elite's want, Population Control???
 

Ssayer

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
19,613
Reaction score
70,986
Location
SE Michigan USA
Top