Never use cca cat5e again! Changed some cca for high quality 100% copper

tech_junkie

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
412
Reaction score
417
Location
South Dakota
CCA often printed on the box the cable came with ..
CCA can be printed on the cable itself ..

you can cut a small section off and try to scrap the coper wire and see if it is solid copper or not.

also you can check resistance .. CCA higher resistance

some also use a fire test .. CCA burns differently than copper ..
The other big mistake a DIY installer would make is using plenum cable outside air vents, floor to floor as this cable is allowed to burn. Plenum shouldn't be ran anywhere except where it shares a ventilation duct/airway. Riser cable is self extinguishing inches from where it catches on fire and designed to do that to prevent the fire from spreading. where plenum is allowed to burn for 12 feet and is not self extinguishing.
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
one channel is half- duplex while another channel is full duplex.
It might be normal if other tcp traffic is going down the wire.

UDP tests is what you need to test, and iperf2 is more accurate for UDP measurements.
noob using iperf - a learning curve

just tried a couple of udp test with iperf2

iperf2 -c 192.168.1.206 -e -i 1 -u -b 1000m

Transfer 1.07 GBytes
Bandwidth 923 Mbits/sec
Jitter 0.915ms
Lost 7621/791474 Datagrams (0.96%)


Between my asus laptop connected to an 8 port tplink TL-SG1008 with the server running on a dell tower windows 10

Also tried
iperf2 -c 192.168.1.206 -u -e -i 1 --isochronous=60:100m,10m --realtime

Transfer: 120 MBytes
Bandwidth: 100 Mbits.sec
Jitter 0.000 ms
Loss/total: 51/85605 (0.06%)

Just tried the --full-duplex parameter - results from server side


[ 8] local 192.168.1.206 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.54 port 59052 (full-duplex) (no-udp-fin)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 8] 0.00-30.01 sec 3.76 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 3.287 ms 0/2678 (0%)
[ 8] 0.00-30.01 sec 3 datagrams received out-of-order
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ *8] 0.00-30.01 sec 3.75 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec
[ 8] Sent 2677 datagrams
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Datagrams PPS
[SUM] 0.00-30.01 sec 7.51 MBytes 2.10 Mbits/sec 5355 179 pps


FYI

1665748905969.png
 
Last edited:

tech_junkie

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
412
Reaction score
417
Location
South Dakota
So its a good 100M cable TCP/UDP but not a good 1GB cable for real time UDP transmissions, but ok for TCP because its asynchronous and retrying packets are not going to be noticeable.

Basically, you get what you pay for in a $80 1000ft roll they sell for $120+
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
So its a good 100M cable TCP/UDP but not a good 1GB cable for real time UDP transmissions, but ok for TCP because its asynchronous and retrying packets are not going to be noticeable.

Basically, you get what you pay for in a $80 1000ft roll they sell for $120+
Do I need to run something like this?
iperf2 -c 192.168.1.206 -u -e -i 1 --isochronous=60:1000m,100m --realtime ?
Changing the 100m parameter to 1000m?

Or do you mean the cca is not handling the giga connection well?
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
So its a good 100M cable TCP/UDP but not a good 1GB cable for real time UDP transmissions, but ok for TCP because its asynchronous and retrying packets are not going to be noticeable.

Basically, you get what you pay for in a $80 1000ft roll they sell for $120+
so worth upgrading to premium 100% copper cables? Is it the cca limiting the transmission from the data you looked at?

What I might do tonight is run a length of the new copper cable between the floors down the stairs externally and retest bypassing the cca
Only got today left with the 66 mts I have as someone else is taking it tomorrow for an installation.
 

tech_junkie

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
412
Reaction score
417
Location
South Dakota
Do I need to run something like this?
iperf2 -c 192.168.1.206 -u -e -i 1 --isochronous=60:1000m,100m --realtime ?
Changing the 100m parameter to 1000m?

Or do you mean the cca is not handling the giga connection well?
Yes, and What does it output.
 

tech_junkie

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
412
Reaction score
417
Location
South Dakota
so worth upgrading to premium 100% copper cables? Is it the cca limiting the transmission from the data you looked at?

What I might do tonight is run a length of the new copper cable between the floors down the stairs externally and retest bypassing the cca
Only got today left with the 66 mts I have as someone else is taking it tomorrow for an installation.
Maybe if it is noticeable, but I wouldn't use that wire in the infrastructure, just patches to equipment.
 

tech_junkie

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
412
Reaction score
417
Location
South Dakota
Reached 10 secs and then:
Warning: did not receive ack of last datagram after 10 tries

after work I will hook up the copper cable and retest
1000m, 100m is used for a 10Gb line (100M payloads)
what does:
iperf2 -c 192.168.1.206 -u -e -i 1 --isochronous=60:1000m,10m --realtime
output (10MB payloads @ 1Gb)?
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
1000m, 100m is used for a 10Gb line (100M payloads)
what does:
iperf2 -c 192.168.1.206 -u -e -i 1 --isochronous=60:1000m,10m --realtime
output (10MB payloads @ 1Gb)?
hmm same result, even with the laptop connected directly to the router
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
interesting.
what is the last line returned when:
iperf -s -u -i 1
That's got it! Thanks

519 Mbytes
435 MBits/sec
Jitter 0.063
Loss 4290/374584 (1.1%)

server side:
[ 1] local 192.168.1.206 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.54 port 51275 (isoch)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 1] 0.00-1.00 sec 49.4 MBytes 415 Mbits/sec 0.049 ms 304/35584 (0.85%)
[ 1] 1.00-2.00 sec 49.5 MBytes 416 Mbits/sec 0.028 ms 0/35346 (0%)
[ 1] 2.00-3.00 sec 51.7 MBytes 434 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 0/36913 (0%)
[ 1] 3.00-4.00 sec 52.3 MBytes 439 Mbits/sec 0.026 ms 0/37338 (0%)
[ 1] 4.00-5.00 sec 50.3 MBytes 422 Mbits/sec 0.014 ms 1923/37824 (5.1%)
[ 1] 5.00-6.00 sec 52.2 MBytes 438 Mbits/sec 0.055 ms 982/38253 (2.6%)
[ 1] 6.00-7.00 sec 54.2 MBytes 455 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 0/38701 (0%)
[ 1] 7.00-8.00 sec 55.1 MBytes 462 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 0/39301 (0%)
[ 1] 8.00-9.00 sec 50.2 MBytes 421 Mbits/sec 0.062 ms 999/36845 (2.7%)
[ 1] 9.00-10.00 sec 53.8 MBytes 452 Mbits/sec 0.064 ms 82/38479 (0.21%)
[ 1] 0.00-10.00 sec 519 MBytes 435 Mbits/sec 0.064 ms 4290/374584 (1.1%)

I'll try the same test from various points in the house
 

tech_junkie

Getting comfortable
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
412
Reaction score
417
Location
South Dakota
Its acceptable, because the errors are recovering in the buffers (greater than 1ns but less than 100ns) ideally, all should return at .001ms or 1ns. This can even happen in copper if the wires are twisted around at the crimps or a twist or pinch in the wire.
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
Its acceptable, because the errors are recovering in the buffers (greater than 1ns but less than 100ns) ideally, all should return at .001ms or 1ns. This can even happen in copper if the wires are twisted around at the crimps or a twist or pinch in the wire.
I'll try the test with the direct coppert cable later if I get time and compare
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
Its acceptable, because the errors are recovering in the buffers (greater than 1ns but less than 100ns) ideally, all should return at .001ms or 1ns. This can even happen in copper if the wires are twisted around at the crimps or a twist or pinch in the wire.
Results from a short cca patch cable directly to my main gateway router


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 3] 0.00-1.00 sec 58.1 MBytes 487 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 5/41467 (0.012%)
[ 3] 1.00-2.00 sec 60.2 MBytes 505 Mbits/sec 0.059 ms 0/42961 (0%)
[ 3] 2.00-3.00 sec 55.7 MBytes 468 Mbits/sec 0.077 ms 2256/42024 (5.4%)
[ 3] 3.00-4.00 sec 58.3 MBytes 489 Mbits/sec 0.008 ms 0/41571 (0%)
[ 3] 4.00-5.00 sec 58.0 MBytes 486 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 556/41911 (1.3%)
[ 3] 5.00-6.00 sec 57.4 MBytes 482 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 356/41330 (0.86%)
[ 3] 6.00-7.00 sec 59.0 MBytes 495 Mbits/sec 0.065 ms 212/42314 (0.5%)
[ 3] 7.00-8.00 sec 59.6 MBytes 500 Mbits/sec 0.020 ms 0/42527 (0%)
[ 3] 8.00-9.00 sec 59.1 MBytes 496 Mbits/sec 0.028 ms 342/42512 (0.8%)
[ 3] 9.00-10.00 sec 57.4 MBytes 481 Mbits/sec 0.007 ms 253/41195 (0.61%)
[ 3] 0.00-10.01 sec 583 MBytes 489 Mbits/sec 0.009 ms 3980/419814 (0.95%)


I may well put a new copper cable in between the isp bridge and my asus gateway. Really not sure if that one is copper or not. Peace of mind for the cable that carries the most traffic between the fibre bridge and gateway
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
Results from downstairs switch (40m cat6 cca direct to gatweway inside wall).

Better than the previous result by the looks of it. So maybe due to the cat6 as opposed to the cat5e. Looks fairly acceptable for cca if I'm not wrong.

525
440
jitter 0.056
Loss 55/374370 (0.015%)

[ 5] local 192.168.1.206 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.54 port 64888 (isoch)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 52.6 MBytes 441 Mbits/sec 0.007 ms 35/37564 (0.093%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 54.5 MBytes 457 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 0/38882 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 53.7 MBytes 450 Mbits/sec 0.002 ms 190/38483 (0.49%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 52.2 MBytes 438 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 0/37243 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 53.1 MBytes 446 Mbits/sec 0.062 ms 0/37915 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 50.1 MBytes 420 Mbits/sec 0.005 ms 0/35722 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 51.6 MBytes 433 Mbits/sec 0.043 ms 0/36831 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 51.3 MBytes 431 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 0/36620 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 53.6 MBytes 450 Mbits/sec 0.031 ms 0/38264 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 52.9 MBytes 444 Mbits/sec 0.009 ms 0/37779 (0%)
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 526 MBytes 441 Mbits/sec 0.061 ms 225/375380 (0.06%)

So I'll replace the patch cable between the switch upstairs(first test) and gateway with a new copper cat5e or cat6
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
New copper path cable between 8 port switch and gateway - tested with better results

590
494
jitter 0.086
loss 0.071%

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 3] 0.00-1.00 sec 59.5 MBytes 499 Mbits/sec 0.030 ms 4/42463 (0.0094%)
[ 3] 1.00-2.00 sec 57.8 MBytes 485 Mbits/sec 0.004 ms 0/41255 (0%)
[ 3] 2.00-3.00 sec 59.7 MBytes 501 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 0/42574 (0%)
[ 3] 3.00-4.00 sec 59.2 MBytes 496 Mbits/sec 0.002 ms 297/42510 (0.7%)
[ 3] 4.00-5.00 sec 59.6 MBytes 500 Mbits/sec 0.025 ms 0/42555 (0%)
[ 3] 5.00-6.00 sec 58.1 MBytes 487 Mbits/sec 0.020 ms 0/41430 (0%)
[ 3] 6.00-7.00 sec 59.2 MBytes 496 Mbits/sec 0.002 ms 0/42231 (0%)
[ 3] 7.00-8.00 sec 59.6 MBytes 500 Mbits/sec 0.045 ms 0/42506 (0%)
[ 3] 8.00-9.00 sec 57.6 MBytes 483 Mbits/sec 0.094 ms 0/41093 (0%)
[ 3] 9.00-10.00 sec 59.7 MBytes 501 Mbits/sec 0.031 ms 0/42597 (0%)
[ 3] 0.00-10.01 sec 590 MBytes 494 Mbits/sec 0.087 ms 301/421216 (0.071%)

compared to before with cca patch cable:



[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 1] 0.00-1.00 sec 49.4 MBytes 415 Mbits/sec 0.049 ms 304/35584 (0.85%)
[ 1] 1.00-2.00 sec 49.5 MBytes 416 Mbits/sec 0.028 ms 0/35346 (0%)
[ 1] 2.00-3.00 sec 51.7 MBytes 434 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 0/36913 (0%)
[ 1] 3.00-4.00 sec 52.3 MBytes 439 Mbits/sec 0.026 ms 0/37338 (0%)
[ 1] 4.00-5.00 sec 50.3 MBytes 422 Mbits/sec 0.014 ms 1923/37824 (5.1%)
[ 1] 5.00-6.00 sec 52.2 MBytes 438 Mbits/sec 0.055 ms 982/38253 (2.6%)
[ 1] 6.00-7.00 sec 54.2 MBytes 455 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 0/38701 (0%)
[ 1] 7.00-8.00 sec 55.1 MBytes 462 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 0/39301 (0%)
[ 1] 8.00-9.00 sec 50.2 MBytes 421 Mbits/sec 0.062 ms 999/36845 (2.7%)
[ 1] 9.00-10.00 sec 53.8 MBytes 452 Mbits/sec 0.064 ms 82/38479 (0.21%)
[ 1] 0.00-10.00 sec 519 MBytes 435 Mbits/sec 0.064 ms 4290/374584 (1.1%)
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
Results from my amd pc that runs blue iris - connected via a yellow cat5e cca to my gateway is not looking good.
I will run a new copper patch cable for that today and retest.

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 54.1 MBytes 454 Mbits/sec 0.021 ms 1209/39802 (3%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 55.5 MBytes 465 Mbits/sec 0.035 ms 678/40275 (1.7%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 55.8 MBytes 468 Mbits/sec 0.065 ms 472/40255 (1.2%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 54.1 MBytes 454 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 470/39099 (1.2%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 56.1 MBytes 470 Mbits/sec 0.047 ms 529/40539 (1.3%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 53.2 MBytes 447 Mbits/sec 0.010 ms 1749/39739 (4.4%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 52.5 MBytes 440 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 1810/39263 (4.6%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 52.6 MBytes 442 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 2012/39572 (5.1%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 53.9 MBytes 452 Mbits/sec 0.012 ms 413/38858 (1.1%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 53.4 MBytes 448 Mbits/sec 0.001 ms 2035/40166 (5.1%)
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 541 MBytes 454 Mbits/sec 0.088 ms 11377/397581 (2.9%)
 

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
Much better 0% loss on my AMD pc now BUT the connection seems to be capped at 100mps - even though I select full duplex 1GB in NIC settings,

How can I fix this? windows 10. Reset network settings perhaps?
UPDATE: bad cable/connectors causing the 100mps cap - Used those pass through RJ45's and sometimes if they don't fit flush they don't work properly

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Write/Err PPS isoch:tx/miss/slip
[ 1] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 88.1 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664989757882231356/6/42
[ 1] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 87.7 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664894858776147444/5/51
[ 1] 2.00-3.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.2 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4665167139440695408/5/52
[ 1] 3.00-4.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.7 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664821783214462638/6/63
[ 1] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.8 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664667394512922033/5/54
[ 1] 5.00-6.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4665150715031971429/5/51
[ 1] 6.00-7.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.7 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664709827429879827/5/52
[ 1] 7.00-8.00 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.4 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664924609880809642/5/52
[ 1] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.95 MBytes 83.5 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664590106995331208/6/66
[ 1] 9.00-10.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 89.4 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4665007189004588970/5/50
[ 1] 0.00-10.00 sec 104 MBytes 87.3 Mbits/sec 0/0 0 pps 4664888577468393221/53/533
[ 1] Sent 74295 datagrams
[ 1] Server Report:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 1] 0.00-10.00 sec 104 MBytes 87.3 Mbits/sec 0.334 ms 0/74294 (0%)
 
Last edited:

Pentagano

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
577
Reaction score
270
Location
Uruguay
Needed a couple of cheap small 4 port switches. Never believed the tenda ones sg105 would deliver Giga for each port. Son happy with his ps4 and laptop (600/60). Kitchen network happy with the 2 exterior cams connected, 5ghz mesh unit and 1 ddwrt access point. No issues.
 

Attachments

Top