I understand getting a 2.8mm lens will give a wider viewing angle but will it also have less of a blindspot than a 3.6mm lens?
If I approach one of my cameras at about 2 feet I disappear from view, this isn't much of a problem if I approach head on. The problem I run into is if someone goes onto my neighbors property or if my neighbor just walks onto my property in between the 2 feet blindspot, they would be able to get to the house side ally unnoticed.
Ideally I would have positioned the camera further back near the ally but it was just not possible. I don't really want to move the position of the camera, but I do need to order another camera to replace a reolink so am thinking of getting a 2.8mm lens this time if that makes any difference? I prefer the 3.6mm lens as it gets everything I want in view properly with no fish eye effect.
Otherwise in the future I can put up another camera pointing in the opposite direction which would give me eyes on the bindspot, but that is more work and added costs.
If I approach one of my cameras at about 2 feet I disappear from view, this isn't much of a problem if I approach head on. The problem I run into is if someone goes onto my neighbors property or if my neighbor just walks onto my property in between the 2 feet blindspot, they would be able to get to the house side ally unnoticed.
Ideally I would have positioned the camera further back near the ally but it was just not possible. I don't really want to move the position of the camera, but I do need to order another camera to replace a reolink so am thinking of getting a 2.8mm lens this time if that makes any difference? I prefer the 3.6mm lens as it gets everything I want in view properly with no fish eye effect.
Otherwise in the future I can put up another camera pointing in the opposite direction which would give me eyes on the bindspot, but that is more work and added costs.