Quite offtopic, but did you have a surge protector for any of those devices?
Ipc-hdw4421emp-as
- Thread starter g_phill
- Start date
nayr
IPCT Contributor
with a direct hit on his property, there is almost nothing he could have done to save the equipment.. short of using grounded (shielded) wiring hooked to an externally grounded lightning arrestor on all external devices.. and even then they wont have a chance to survive a direct hit, and all bets are off with a near-miss.
surge protector might of helped if a transformer a few blocks away took a direct hit.. it depends largely on luck.. I am betting all his gear was fried from induced current picked up by the wiring acting as antenna.. I doubt the surge came in via power mains alone.
surge protector might of helped if a transformer a few blocks away took a direct hit.. it depends largely on luck.. I am betting all his gear was fried from induced current picked up by the wiring acting as antenna.. I doubt the surge came in via power mains alone.
I think the only difference as far as IP cameras are concerned is that "PAL" cameras are often artificially limited to 25 or 50 FPS whereas "NTSC" cameras can do 30 or 60 FPS. If you were pulling analog video from a camera, it would be a different story.
Last edited by a moderator:
nayr
IPCT Contributor
the sub-stream resolutions are slightly different also on a PAL Camera, but the encoding and formatting are entirely identical so it has no impact on playback compatibilities.. the resolutions on the PAL sub streams are higher than that of NTSC substreams, and that accounts for lower limits on the framerate.
for smoothest playback, use a framerate thats divisible by 60 for NTSC countries.. (6/10/12/15/20 FPS) this will avoid the 2:3 teardown and result in smoother motion on playback.
for smoothest playback, use a framerate thats divisible by 60 for NTSC countries.. (6/10/12/15/20 FPS) this will avoid the 2:3 teardown and result in smoother motion on playback.