- Dec 8, 2017
- 130
- 51
I've been demoing BI for about a week now and while I like what I see (and the UI3 update is great as well) my question to myself is whether I will be better served using BI or Surveillance Station on my DS3615xs.
I have had good luck with my limited use of SS and I like it's features but I am admittedly not very experienced in using it in depth. I only have 3 crappy cameras at present (upgrades incoming over time) and anticipate having 6-8 cameras by the time I'm done, likely a combination of Dahuas which are supported by both SS and BI.
I own 8 camera licenses for SS presently so investment wise there's no cost to me going forward if I stick with SS. With BI I'd have a modest investment but the price seems very reasonable.
So ultimately my question is will BI give me important features that SS does not? I've looked here in the forums and elsewhere but haven't really found any comparisons of the two feature wise. My lack of real experience in the surveillance camera world makes it a bit difficult for me to judge.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
I have had good luck with my limited use of SS and I like it's features but I am admittedly not very experienced in using it in depth. I only have 3 crappy cameras at present (upgrades incoming over time) and anticipate having 6-8 cameras by the time I'm done, likely a combination of Dahuas which are supported by both SS and BI.
I own 8 camera licenses for SS presently so investment wise there's no cost to me going forward if I stick with SS. With BI I'd have a modest investment but the price seems very reasonable.
So ultimately my question is will BI give me important features that SS does not? I've looked here in the forums and elsewhere but haven't really found any comparisons of the two feature wise. My lack of real experience in the surveillance camera world makes it a bit difficult for me to judge.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.