beepsilver
Getting comfortable
And as of this morning, 8 July 21, the latest version of Deepstack appears to be v1.2.1. The CPU version for Windows installer filename is DeepStack-Installer-CPU-2021.02.1.exe.
5.4.9 - June 25, 2021
- Thread starter fenderman
- Start date
kc8tmv
Getting the hang of it
How can I tell which version is running now? Does this count as my stupid question of the day?
sebastiantombs
Known around here
Uhhh, maybe look at the file dates in the DeepStack directory? Or look at the file you installed from? The answer is always right there, behind the milk 
The deepstack.exe on my machine has a file date of 02/06/2021 which I think is the latest.
The deepstack.exe on my machine has a file date of 02/06/2021 which I think is the latest.
beepsilver
Getting comfortable
I have the same date for deepstack.exe and used the installation file version I mentioned above.Uhhh, maybe look at the file dates in the DeepStack directory? Or look at the file you installed from? The answer is always right there, behind the milk
The deepstack.exe on my machine has a file date of 02/06/2021 which I think is the latest.
sebastiantombs
Known around here
Just updated to 5.4.9.6 and got a 170 error right out of the gate again. I'll let it run until after dinner before reverting back again if it's too error prone.
That's really strange, I've never seen any errors from DS with any of the 5.4.9.x releases.
sebastiantombs
Known around here
I'm just getting 170 errors, no 100 and no -1. I am getting "can't find this file" when I try to play back clips from one camera that I've tested, so far. The same behavior as last time is still happening, "can't find this file" then if I click on the previous lip that was successfully identified, it will play through the clips that give the file error. As usual, tuning shows detection in all of them. So, from my perspective 5.4.9.5 id no better than the rest of the 5.4.9.x series. Back to 5.4.8.2 yet again.
kc8tmv
Getting the hang of it
Anyone know what 5.9.4.6 is supposed to fix, address or add? Almost afraid to try, but then again, I like being a guinea pig!
jaydeel
BIT Beta Team
kc8tmv
Getting the hang of it
Still happy enough with 5.9.4.6? Server Errors all gone, even with custom models?
beepsilver
Getting comfortable
I'm still getting error 100--when they happen early in the analysis, the alert is canceled when it should be confirmed.
sebastiantombs
Known around here
I let it go all night with dark.pt included. Lots of 100 and 170 errors. I have shut off models and will let it run today that way to see if there's a change on my system without a model.
beepsilver
Getting comfortable
I'll do the same, but not hopeful that the default model will work as well at night...we'll see
sebastiantombs
Known around here
With just a couple of hours running on the stock model, the detection rate is way up and there's only a few error, mostly 170. I'll see how it does overnight. When detection is working better, more like it does in tuning, it does work fairly well at night so we'll see what happens.
kc8tmv
Getting the hang of it
This is 5.9.4.6, with custom models? If so, which custom models?
I'm attending the BI webinar right now. I asked Ken about DS errors 100 and 170. Here's his response.
Is there info on the possible Deepstack errors? Specifically 100 and 170?
ken 11:12 AM
These both indicate DS did not complete or did not respond. Only known solution is to restart DS. Blue Iris will attempt this for you if it’s configured to also start/stop DS for you.
Is there info on the possible Deepstack errors? Specifically 100 and 170?
ken 11:12 AM
These both indicate DS did not complete or did not respond. Only known solution is to restart DS. Blue Iris will attempt this for you if it’s configured to also start/stop DS for you.
kc8tmv
Getting the hang of it
Why are we seeing these in the latest versions and not previous versions? Seems to be much worse when custom model use is checked.
PS. We LOVE the software, just would like to be able to help him out more!