5.4.9 - June 25, 2021

kklee

Pulling my weight
Joined
May 9, 2020
Messages
187
Reaction score
203
Location
Vancouver, BC
Did some reconfiguration last night after installing a Quadro P400 in my BI PC. I ran into some weird issues and had to make some interesting changes.

I disabled DS, installed the P400 and requisite Nvidia drivers. After this, CPU kept running well over 90% without making any other changes. I eventually found that I had to change all cameras that used H265 to H264 and that brought utilization back down to previous levels, around 40% (using Intel QSV HA). I tried using nVidia for HA, but it would only enable HA for half the cameras, so I left it on Intel.

I then installed DS for GPU and re-enabled DS with custom (dark) model.

Before I had the GPU installed, BI CPU would regularly hit 99% CPU during DS runs and return DS errors. With the GPU installed, it hits 80% during DS analysis (with dark model enabled) and no DS errors.

This is running the latest version, 5.4.9.11
 

hikky_b

Pulling my weight
Joined
Nov 24, 2019
Messages
156
Reaction score
168
Location
London
No change in that regard here.
And you're using Continuous+Triggered in the Record tab with a pretrigger buffer of ?
And is the pre-trigger long enough to get to the next i-frame?
Thank you all for the help! I've made the error of using continuous+alerts vs continuous+triggered. Switching those affected cams to +triggered has brought back pre-trigger main stream recording. I was fairly sure main stream pre-trigger buffer recording also worked with +alerts but I appear to be wrong. Would be a great addition however, if possible.

Using a five second buffer with 15:15
 

JL-F1

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Messages
120
Reaction score
73
Location
USA
Update 5.4.9.11 seems to be screwing with my leading image in the DS analysis. With motion-leading image turned off, I have no t-0, and instead, I'm getting an earlier leading image presumably at the keyframe. Even weirder, with motion-leading images turned on, I'm still getting no t-0, but TWO that are earlier than that, and in reverse chronological order.
I noticed that with the 5.4.9.11 update my DS timing is one analysis every 750ms not every 1 sec as I had it, I think the update changed that. Maybe check that
 

stev067

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Messages
34
Reaction score
36
Location
Kalamazoo
I noticed that with the 5.4.9.11 update my DS timing is one analysis every 750ms not every 1 sec as I had it, I think the update changed that. Maybe check that
Thanks but my T+ snapshots are all right around 500ms intervals where I set them. It's just the T-0 and earlier that are suddenly screwy, and still so with 5.4.9.12. I'm not going to scrutinize it too much until I have my upgrade camera tomorrow whose keyframes are greater than 0.25.
 

sebastiantombs

Known around here
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
11,511
Reaction score
27,696
Location
New Jersey
.12 seemed pretty good as well. I just update to .13 and watched memory wander up and down a little but it'll take some time until the verdict comes in.
 

kc8tmv

Getting the hang of it
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
177
Reaction score
82
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio
It brings up the frame that DS used for successful detection rather than play the entire clip.
Figured this out after reading your post, but I would love to have release notes.
I’m still staying on .10 for a bit. Not sure if I’m missing out on any new features or not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

105437

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jun 8, 2015
Messages
2,054
Reaction score
954
Start from the top down in the help file. After the boiler plate the recent features are described.
Got it! I searched for "double click" and not "double-click".

How about this one. What does Timeout(s) represent on the global AI tab?
1627003320231.png
 

sebastiantombs

Known around here
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
11,511
Reaction score
27,696
Location
New Jersey
I assume, and we know what that does, that sets the maximum time that DS will search in models attempting to make a detection.
 

stev067

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Messages
34
Reaction score
36
Location
Kalamazoo
Man I was hoping upgrading cameras would fix this, but I'm still having an issue where my leading image of every DS analysis is at T-4500ms or so. And then there is no T-0, so the second image is my T+500ms. Could a setting cause this, or did is this a bug? Nobody else is seeing this? I even tried reinstalling DS, but I fear it's a bug where maybe I would have to reinstall BI.
 
Top