Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
Sybertiger
Known around here
Nothing to see here. Nothing to be concerned about.
nypost.com
Chinese lab crafts mutant COVID strain with 100% kill rate in ‘humanized’ mice: ‘Surprisingly’ rapid death
Most eerie of all, the mice’s eyes turned completely white the day before they died.
nypost.com
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
^^ During WWII the formular companies made a fortune with the gov't telling women that formular was better for their babies and this allowed them to work in the factories during wartime. But once the guys came home, the gov't changed its tune and ran campaigns to get women back to breast feeding so that the retuning troops could find work in the factories.
bigredfish
Known around here
This is kinda scary shit. And its bad, and our Govt doesnt care presumably becasue they want you dead.
DNA Contaminants In COVID Vaccines Are 'Beyond The Pale': Florida Surgeon General
DNA Contaminants In COVID Vaccines Are 'Beyond The Pale': Florida Surgeon General | ZeroHedge
DNA Contaminants In COVID Vaccines Are 'Beyond The Pale': Florida Surgeon General
DNA Contaminants In COVID Vaccines Are 'Beyond The Pale': Florida Surgeon General | ZeroHedge
bigredfish
Known around here
all about the money.
How Moderna Came Up With A Vaccine Against Vaccine Dissent: Lee Fang
How Moderna Came Up With A Vaccine Against Vaccine Dissent: Lee Fang | ZeroHedge
.......Like the Twitter Files, the Moderna Reports highlight the push by powerful entities – especially government, Big Tech, and Big Pharma – to identify and brand dissenting opinions about establishment narratives as risky forms of speech. The growing network these efforts rely on shows the growth of what has been called the censorship industrial complex. Moderna’s faltering financials also suggest, at least for now, the limits of that project.
....In other words, anything that might discourage children from vaccinations, despite any risks or lack of benefits, is dangerous information. That suggests a motive far from bringing truth to the vaccine debate, and far more about dominating it for financial gain.
Near the end of the Moderna call last September, as the biotech firm worked to highlight its stepped-up outreach to consumers, James Mock, the chief financial officer, spoke briefly to assure investors of the company’s ability to continue to make money.
“COVID is a very valuable product line of business and will continue to be,” said Mock, “and we'll make it more profitable.”
How Moderna Came Up With A Vaccine Against Vaccine Dissent: Lee Fang
How Moderna Came Up With A Vaccine Against Vaccine Dissent: Lee Fang | ZeroHedge
.......Like the Twitter Files, the Moderna Reports highlight the push by powerful entities – especially government, Big Tech, and Big Pharma – to identify and brand dissenting opinions about establishment narratives as risky forms of speech. The growing network these efforts rely on shows the growth of what has been called the censorship industrial complex. Moderna’s faltering financials also suggest, at least for now, the limits of that project.
....In other words, anything that might discourage children from vaccinations, despite any risks or lack of benefits, is dangerous information. That suggests a motive far from bringing truth to the vaccine debate, and far more about dominating it for financial gain.
Near the end of the Moderna call last September, as the biotech firm worked to highlight its stepped-up outreach to consumers, James Mock, the chief financial officer, spoke briefly to assure investors of the company’s ability to continue to make money.
“COVID is a very valuable product line of business and will continue to be,” said Mock, “and we'll make it more profitable.”
Nothing to worry aboutNothing to see here. Nothing to be concerned about.
Chinese lab crafts mutant COVID strain with 100% kill rate in ‘humanized’ mice: ‘Surprisingly’ rapid death
Most eerie of all, the mice’s eyes turned completely white the day before they died.
Covid lab squeak? Mouse manages to escape hapless Chinese lab worker
Lab technician Tian Yongyi frantically searches for the mouse, even lying on the floor to look under cabinets as the clever rodent clings to her and scrambles over her back without her noticing.
bigredfish
Known around here
And at the US controlled weapons labs (like the Univ of NC Chapel Hill) they're probably only hiring DEI approved applicants... 
Sybertiger
Known around here
Link no workie. The truth suppressors were quick!Nothing to worry about
Covid lab squeak? Mouse manages to escape hapless Chinese lab worker
Lab technician Tian Yongyi frantically searches for the mouse, even lying on the floor to look under cabinets as the clever rodent clings to her and scrambles over her back without her noticing.www.dailymail.co.uk
bigredfish
Known around here
I go to it... maybe your Interwebs are being selective..
Sybertiger
Known around here
Must have gotten cooties when I accidently clicked on a msnbc link last week.
I double checked, works for me OK.
Me Three...
Sybertiger
Known around here
I think I need to reach out to Al Gore. Chrome, Edge, Opera all the same result.
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2017
- Messages
- 13,960
- Reaction score
- 23,269
FYI - copy and paste the post here in case it gets removed from twitter ..
See new posts
Conversation
Kevin Bass PhD MS
@kevinnbass
Why masks don't work against COVID-19: the evidence on surgical masks to prevent infections during surgery Several arguments are commonly provided to justify masking recommendations despite the lack of credible data. One of them is that surgeons and doctors mask, and since surgeons and doctors must know what they are doing, masks must work. This argument is wrong for several reasons. First, it is an appeal to authority. And the authority of physicians is by no means infallible. In one study examining all randomized controlled trials testing established medical practice published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2009, 16 of 35, or almost half, were shown to be ineffective or harmful [1]. In another study, this time examining all articles in the New England Journal of Medicine published from 2001 to 2010, 146 of 363 of randomized controlled trials examining standard of care treatments showed these treatments to be ineffective or harmful [2]. Current untested medical practices, at least as of 2010, were nearly as likely to be ineffective or harmful as they were to be beneficial. Moreover, although a symbol of surgery, for more than half a century research has shown that surgical masks have no impact on wound infection during surgical procedures. In one study from 1975, researchers assessed microbiological contamination of an eight-room operating room suite; it was concluded that the presence of people were the overwhelming determining factor of bacterial contamination and that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination and probably work only to redirect the projectile effect of talking and breathing” [3]. In another study from 1981, researchers found that their rate of infections actually significantly decreased when the surgeons in their study stopped using surgical masks [4], a finding that later researchers attributed to the redirection of bacteria out of the sides of the mask and into the wound [5]. Another study from 1989 found that there was no difference in infection rates in catheterization patients when physicians were wearing masks and caps versus not wearing them [6]. A study in 2002 reaffirmed this conclusion [7]. A 2001 review strikingly came to the conclusion that “the evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use” [8]. A systematic review from 2009 concludes: “From the limited randomized trials it is still not clear whether wearing surgical face masks harms or benefits the patients undergoing elective surgery” [9]. A 2010 statement from the Karolinska Institute put things: “When introduced a century ago, the purpose of the surgical facemask was to provide protection for the patient from surgical wound infections. But is there evidence that face masks prevent wound infections? A recent review concluded that it is not clear whether face masks prevent surgical wound infections, and the scientific evidence for this practice is weak and insufficient” [10]. A 2014 review of the trials investigating masks during surgical procedures found that: “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials” [11]. A 2015 review concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination” [12]. And a 2002 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of three trials and 2113 participants found that “There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials” [13]. Updated versions of this review from 2014 [14] and 2016 [15] came to the same conclusions. The story of masking among surgeons is an excellent one in demonstrating that plausible theories do not always translate into effective practices. Although it was once thought that surgical masks could stop droplets from the oral cavity from traveling onto the patient and increasing rates of infection, new ideas have revised this understanding. It has been shown, for instance, that masks create friction and cause the falling of skin cells directly onto the surgical field, potentially making the problem of hygiene worse than it would have been without a mask. To test these competing theories, tests in a clinical trial setting must be conducted to show that the theory in question actually impacts the outcome in question (infection rates). As yet, these tests have not shown the benefit of masks, and indeed, surgical masks might indeed in the final analysis turn out to be mildly detrimental. None of this implies that surgeons should necessarily stop masking. I certainly would not feel altogether comfortable if my surgeon decided not to mask; but I wouldn't feel entirely uncomfortable, either, since the studies do show that the difference from the practice is small to the point of being undetectable. This case study does show, however, that we cannot always trust our guesses: we need evidence. It also shows that masking among surgeons to prevent surgery-related infections is by no means a powerful argument for masking among the community to prevent COVID-19 infections. After all, among surgeons compliance to masking is perfect and occurs throughout the entire surgery, and masks most certainly do block bacteria from the oral cavity, and yet still no impact on infection is seen among surgeons who mask versus those who go maskless. In contrast, among the general population, masking compliance is imperfect, people still must remove their masks for eating, etc., and masks most certainly do not block virus particles anywhere near as effectively as they block bacteria. If there is not measurable impact of surgeons masking on the infection rates during surgery, then we would certainly not expect to see an impact on rate of respiratory virus infection from community masking. (Which is exactly what we see in the clinical trial data for masking against respiratory viruses.) It turns out, therefore, the data on masking for surgeries actually is a strong argument AGAINST surgical masks being effective against respiratory viruses. And in order to know that, we needed to look at the data. There's a lesson there. Acknowledgements: Thanks to
@Fynnderella1
for many of these papers and the interpretations. I draw heavily from her thread to write large parts of this post. [1] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/1105961… [2] https://mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(13)00405-9/fulltext… [3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1157412/ [4] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7294681/ [5] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2766345/ [6] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2766345/ [7] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11924291/ [8] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11512642/ [9] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20524498/ [10] https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/113/6/1447/9572/Is-Routine-Use-of-a-Face-Mask-Necessary-in-the… [11] https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/2014/09030/Surgical_Attire_and_the_Operating_Room__Role_in.11.aspx… [12] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26085560/ [13] https://cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002929/full… [14] https://cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub2/full… [15] https://cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub3/full…
Last edited3:21 PM · Jan 7, 2024
·
94.1K
Views
Sybertiger
Known around here
Welp, Al Gore said he was busy. Something about getting a nipple ring?! He heard that George Bush got a Dick Cheney.
Since he was no help I did the following which worked:
Command Prompt: ipconfig/release > ipconfig/renew > reboot
Last edited:
tech_junkie
Getting comfortable
Update:
Fauci is implemented for gain of function research. More court dates scheduled in the future.
Arati Prabhakar, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, was convicted of conspiracy to commit treason and insurrection and sentenced to death Tuesday morning at a Guantanamo Bay military tribunal,Admiral Crandall scheduled Prabhakar’s execution for January 30.
Special investigation team is investigating the 'paid incentives' that occurred in the medical industry for future medical fraud cases:
Fauci is implemented for gain of function research. More court dates scheduled in the future.
Arati Prabhakar, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, was convicted of conspiracy to commit treason and insurrection and sentenced to death Tuesday morning at a Guantanamo Bay military tribunal,Admiral Crandall scheduled Prabhakar’s execution for January 30.
Special investigation team is investigating the 'paid incentives' that occurred in the medical industry for future medical fraud cases:
tech_junkie
Getting comfortable
Because I am the authority on masks for the United States. and Elon knows it.
Right now I'm keeping away from X on purpose.
The story with the mask goes back to the early 90s when me and a panel of biological warfare specialist wanted them banned because they are a general safety hazard and the medical industry in an Africa country waged bioterrorism with that mask. The modification to their biosaftey level protocols to add a visor to the protocol was the outcome. Because the medical industry didn't want to give up the mask because they consider it part of their uniform.
The hazards are for the mask is that 1 in 5 that wears one outside from disinfecting air systems like doctor's & dentist's offices, hospitals and clinics will catch a respiratory disease, more commonly, pneumonia, and 1 out of 5 that get sick from wearing the mask will die. That is why China has a pneumonia plague. They are making themselves sick by wearing that mask.
