Close Focus Distance | 2.8 mm: 5 m (16.40 ft) 3.6 mm: 6 m (19.68 ft) 6 mm: 13.2 m (43.37 ft) |
So, how do you use a 6mm effectively?Yes. Because their close focus distance is horrible.
Close Focus Distance 2.8 mm: 5 m (16.40 ft)
3.6 mm: 6 m (19.68 ft)
6 mm: 13.2 m (43.37 ft)
Well, I guess it's a boat anchor thenAs an overview installed higher.
It is a known limitation of that combination (many threads here on it) and is more obvious in some fields of view. We typically don't recommend the 6mm version and for awhile Andy quit selling it.
To many here, this was when it was realized that 4MP is the sweet spot for these types of cameras given the technology they are all currently using.
Why? That FOV having a little out of focus in the near foreground is not really a problem. What is going to be that close that would be an issue if it is a little out of focus?Well, I guess it's a boat anchor then
It's an OCD thing. It would drive me nutsWhy? That FOV having a little out of focus in the near foreground is not really a problem. What is going to be that close that would be an issue if it is a little out of focus?
Adjust your color/sat levels if you need to remove some color out.Also, it is me or does the 1/1.2" sensor tend to lean towards the red end of the spectrum?
Yeah, 30 feet in the air in a residential area isn't going to happenAdjust your color/sat levels if you need to remove some color out.
I run the 3.6mm 4K-X variant for overview of my business parking lot. It’s awesome as far as light collecting ability goes but I also have it mounted 30 feet in the air so there are no soft/unfocused spots at that distance.
Nope. These cameras arent for residential use with their dismal close focus distance requirements.Yeah, 30 feet in the air is a residential area isn't going to happen![]()
I wasn't going to consider the 4K cameras, but since they do better at lower light levels, I figured I'd give them a try in 3 locations. I thought the 6mm would be perfect for the long shot of the road, but the focus doesn't work for me. So, I switched that location to a 3.6mm version. I still have a 3.6mm Turret 4K that I want to use in the front of the house, but that will be for another day. I also have the south facing camera which was planned for the 3.6mm 4K-X, but that is now where the 6mm was supposed to go. I also still have two T54IR-AS 3.6mm cameras which will likely be used for the driveway. Lots to doWith OCD, you will want to stay away from the 1/1.2" sensors LOL.
Between the tight area of focus circle that is evident even on the smaller focal lengths and the issues of some field of views need higher bitrates than the camera can handle, it will drive you nuts.
With a few exceptions of makes/models, the 1/1.2" shows that these cameras are not infinity focus, so with OCD, stay away LOL. Go with the 4MP 5442 series.
Your field of view is gonna be problematic.
All that grass and pavement with the higher clarity of that sensor means it is trying to resolve every granular angle, so if the bitrate can't keep up, it will be soft looking. And that certainly isn't helping the close up areas.
With certain colors of grass, yes it can give that weird saturation look. Mine does that too. You have to take some big swings at the saturation levels.
In the locations chosen, yes, she's ok with the light.So the WAF is ok with running the white LEDs on the camera? In other posts you said you don't have a lot of light.
In the locations chosen, yes, she's ok with the light.
Now let's not get crazy. I had to do some wheeling and dealing to get the ones I gotYou got lucky there! Many don't want the light as it isn't aesthetic and draws attention to the camera LOL.
Take advantage of this to run a whole string of cameras to be symmetrical around the fence and house!