Raid 0 is not redundant at all. In fact, it's worse than a single drive.
Yes. I stand corrected. I meant Raid 1 minimum. I set up ZFS on my NAS so long ago and haven't had any issues (knock on wood). I think this is technically a RAID 60 here...
[user@nas ~]$ zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub repaired 0B in 2h50m with 0 errors on Sun Sep 1 04:50:03 2019
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_23D3JZUAS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_461ZGR8GS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_23DER83GS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_4620K40GS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_83O2GRAKS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_46209S9GS ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_83O2GRYKS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_46209RZGS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_83O2GSLKS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_85DATG5GS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_83O2GTBKS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_4620JUNGS ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_83O2JLNKS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_85EB6W3GS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_93H57EJKS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_461Z9GRGS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_DT01ACA300_Y44TZPWGS ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-TOSHIBA_HDWD130_85EB6W7GS ONLINE 0 0 0
logs
mirror-3 ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-INTEL_SSDSC2BA100G3_BTTV4222016H100FGN-part1 ONLINE 0 0 0
ata-INTEL_SSDSC2BA100G3_BTTV422203UF100FGN-part1 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors