Thought I'd throw my 2cents in here. I have two of these operating between my house and workshop (About 140 feet).
TP-Link CPE210 2.4GHz 300Mbps 9dBi High Power Outdoor CPE/Access Point, 2.4GHz 300Mbps, 802.11b/g/n, dual-polarized 9dBi directional antenna, Passive POE (CPE210)
Linking one's network wirelessly to a remote IP camera seems to be a recurring task lately. A sticky in order? IMHO, here's a recent thread with some good info here --> Networking a 1000' gap
Regarding the TP-LINK mentioned by @molimelight, I've installed about a half dozen Ubiquiti Layer 2 Transparent Bridges over the past 3 or 4 years and all have performed very well. I'm a big fan of UBNT.
In the case of TP-LINK, I've installed 30+ TP-LINK products (switches, PC wireless cards, indoor wireless routers, DSL modem/routers and a couple of outdoor high power AP's) and all have performed well and have been a good value. My only complaint with TP-LINK's early outdoor AP (the WA5210G) is the same as the Engenius units around the same time: the passive POE injector was this beige, clunky looking device where you plugged in a wall-wart type power supply.
This newer TP-LINK that you pointed out has my attention for several reasons: the price for a 2.4 GHz, 500mw unit is about $30 less than a similar UBNT Nanostation M2, it has a TDMA protocol available (PharOS?) likely similar to UBNT's AirMax, has a UBNT-like passive POE injector and like UBNT's Nanostation M2 (NSM2-US), it has a second LAN port to network a remote cam, possibly negating the need and expense of a switch. And lastly, it appears it will mount much like a UBNT. I've been making cheap PVC mounts as seen in the image below.
That being said, it's just not enough to make me want to switch from UBNT, as I am familiar with UBNT's web GUI, how to configure, etc, and I have confidence in them; all worth that $30. One service call during the warranty period will negate that savings...twofold. Now if someone is a first-time builder of a wireless bridge or single high power, directional AP to blast out onto the patio, it very well could meet their needs. I don't hang my hat just on amazon reviews but I do pay attention: there has to be a reason why TP-LINK has almost 4 times as many 1 and 2 star reviews (22% for TP-LINK and 6% for UBNT). I am aware also that too many reviewers give 1 or 2 stars because they expect to plug them in and they will work like magic; they don't have the knowledge to configure them, let alone a simple network and they ding the product for their own ineptitude. I will continue, however, to buy and use TP-LINK switches, DSL modem/routers and PC wireless cards.
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate IPCamTalk earns from qualifying purchases.