Hi folks,
Apparently I'm not allowed to delete my post, which I posted as soon as I realized I had made a poor decision to buy a Reolink system. I asked a lot of naive questions that were probably "too dumb to ask".
Since I can't delete it, this post is completely rewritten.
Please forgive this little rant: I've noticed that it seems for a lot of members of this forum, IP cameras are a "hobby". I like technology, but frankly I don't have time for my security system to be a hobby, or to spend a lot of work and research to get it working. I want to buy it, install it, and then forget about it unless something interesting happens.
It kinda seems to me the security system market has some catching up to do. Nest and Arlo are selling like hotcakes right now because there are a lot of people like me. They want a system that "just works".
I bought Reolink system because it appeared to be what I needed: Buy it, install it, forgetaboutit! (And avoid monthly fees.) Well, that's what I got. It came with the cables. The hard disk was already formatted in the NVR, and it even came with stickers and a CD.
Yes, unfortunately, the software is glitchy and the cameras are disappointing, and I've learned there's no way around that because I can't really use the cameras with Blue Iris or similar due to unethical practices by Reolink. That's a big disappointment.
But now, starting from almost zero prior knowledge, I've put about 24 nonstop hours into researching to find the right cameras, the right NVR, what cables will work, whether each component or software will work with other components, which systems are reliable... and ya know what I realize?
Reolink works. It will deter the bad guys, and if it doesn't I'll have the footage I want. The cameras and software are disappointing, but I run a business and time is money. It's now clear whatever alternative I might find... something will need hours of troubleshooting. I can't afford that.
So, instead of finding better cameras, I'll add MORE cameras (spending less overall than a quality replacement system) so I can make out faces and license plates. From where I stand now, it's the cheaper solution in terms of money and time.
I think if the industry comes up with an affordable, simple, high quality "plug and play" security camera system with local recording to an NVR, (avoiding monthly fees) it could take a big chunk out of the niche that Nest and Arlo have tapped into. Those systems have drawbacks, but they do "just work".
Thanks for listening. I'm sure some will disagree.
Apparently I'm not allowed to delete my post, which I posted as soon as I realized I had made a poor decision to buy a Reolink system. I asked a lot of naive questions that were probably "too dumb to ask".
Since I can't delete it, this post is completely rewritten.
Please forgive this little rant: I've noticed that it seems for a lot of members of this forum, IP cameras are a "hobby". I like technology, but frankly I don't have time for my security system to be a hobby, or to spend a lot of work and research to get it working. I want to buy it, install it, and then forget about it unless something interesting happens.
It kinda seems to me the security system market has some catching up to do. Nest and Arlo are selling like hotcakes right now because there are a lot of people like me. They want a system that "just works".
I bought Reolink system because it appeared to be what I needed: Buy it, install it, forgetaboutit! (And avoid monthly fees.) Well, that's what I got. It came with the cables. The hard disk was already formatted in the NVR, and it even came with stickers and a CD.
Yes, unfortunately, the software is glitchy and the cameras are disappointing, and I've learned there's no way around that because I can't really use the cameras with Blue Iris or similar due to unethical practices by Reolink. That's a big disappointment.
But now, starting from almost zero prior knowledge, I've put about 24 nonstop hours into researching to find the right cameras, the right NVR, what cables will work, whether each component or software will work with other components, which systems are reliable... and ya know what I realize?
Reolink works. It will deter the bad guys, and if it doesn't I'll have the footage I want. The cameras and software are disappointing, but I run a business and time is money. It's now clear whatever alternative I might find... something will need hours of troubleshooting. I can't afford that.
So, instead of finding better cameras, I'll add MORE cameras (spending less overall than a quality replacement system) so I can make out faces and license plates. From where I stand now, it's the cheaper solution in terms of money and time.
I think if the industry comes up with an affordable, simple, high quality "plug and play" security camera system with local recording to an NVR, (avoiding monthly fees) it could take a big chunk out of the niche that Nest and Arlo have tapped into. Those systems have drawbacks, but they do "just work".
Thanks for listening. I'm sure some will disagree.
Last edited: