BORIStheBLADE
Getting comfortable
Up until now I had it unchecked. Enabled this and still about the same difference between sub and regular stream. My cpu dropped 10% all the way around though which is nice.Are you using limit decoding?
Up until now I had it unchecked. Enabled this and still about the same difference between sub and regular stream. My cpu dropped 10% all the way around though which is nice.Are you using limit decoding?
dont use it unless you understand it. It will screw with motion detection.Up until now I had it unchecked. Enabled this and still about the same difference between sub and regular stream. My cpu dropped 10% all the way around though which is nice.
Good info. Ill go back to unchecked. Thanksdont use it unless you understand it. It will screw with motion detection.
I finally got around to setting up substreams and found the following comment in the Sub stream guide:5.3.0 - July 9, 2020
When recording direct-to-disc with a dual-streaming camera, now BOTH streams are saved
to the BVR file.
I cannot find a 'Record dual-streams if available' option in my BI version 5.3.3.8. Is that option only available in an older or newer version of BI? Is this in any way related to the first quote above from @fenderman? That is, does my version simply always record the substream as well? Or is that comment related to the CAM number (actual different camera within the same enclosure) and not the substreams?It is strongly recommended that you keep enabled "Record dual-streams if available", so that both the main and sub streams are written to BVR files.
In 5.3.0 when the sub stream recording was added, the option didn't exist yet so it just always recorded the sub stream if your chosen format was BVR. I'm not sure when the option was added. You'll find the option near the bottom of the camera properties > Record tab.I cannot find a 'Record dual-streams if available' option in my BI version 5.3.3.8. Is that option only available in an older or newer version of BI?
Unclear what you are referring to.Is this in any way related to the first quote above from @fenderman?