US Elections (& Politics) :)

David L

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
8,062
Reaction score
21,112
Location
USA
Found something/someone who seems almost believable in the face of all the media disinformation coming from all angles.

I agree with this guy, no nation is trying to stop Russia, and Ukraine does not have a chance in saving their country, no matter what MTM tries to unload on us, I just pray Putin stops with Ukraine and does not advance any further. Of course I feel for the people of Ukraine like anyone one would seeing a country taken over by another. We are seeing a reunification of the Soviet Union but I also believe this is actually a war against NATO to stop their advance, according to Russia, because once NATO is in it is Russia against the world.

1647787162588.png

1647788926266.png
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,973
Reaction score
23,296
I agree with this guy, no nation is trying to stop Russia, and Ukraine does not have a chance in saving their country, no matter what MTM tries to unload on us, I just pray Putin stops with Ukraine and does not advance any further. Of course I feel for the people of Ukraine like anyone one would seeing a country taken over by another. We are seeing a reunification of the Soviet Union but I also believe this is actually a war against NATO to stop their advance, according to Russia, because once NATO is in it is Russia against the world.

View attachment 122734

View attachment 122737
Wanting to be secure from being forced back under the Thump of Russia dominance is a key reason why countries and their people elect to join NATO.

To better understand why countries want to join NATO and not be under a new Soviet / Russian neo-empire / new-Warsaw Pact we really need to examine the information that comes from those nations and people who have joined or have asked to join NATO.

Too often the USA thinks of things as a black or white / polar set of sides .. ( USA vs communism, Democrat vs Republican, Godly vs Godless, .. )

It's fair to ask if we should or should not have encouraged Ukraine to join NATO .. yet, I doubt any of us wants to live under the system that is now Russia. It is clear that many Ukrainians do not want to live under the Russia thumb as is demonstrated by the Ukrainians standing up to the Russian invaders in protest.
 
Last edited:

David L

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
8,062
Reaction score
21,112
Location
USA
Wanting to be secure from being forced back under the Thump of Russia dominance is a key reason why countries and their people elect to join NATO.

To better understand why countries want to join NATO and not be under a new Soviet / Russian neo-empire / new-Warsaw Pact we really need to examine the information that comes from those nations and people who have joined or have asked to join NATO.

Too often the USA thinks of things as a black or white / polar set of sides .. ( USA vs communism, Democrat vs Republican, Godly vs Godless, .. )

It's fair to ask if we should or should not have encouraged Ukraine to join NATO .. yet, I doubt any of us wants to live under the system that is now Russia. It is clear that many Ukrainians do not want to live under the Russia thumb as is demonstrated by the Ukrainians standing up to the Russian invaders in protest.
yet, I doubt any of us wants to live under the system that is now Russia.
I wish your last sentence were true for all of the U.S., it is definitely true for most all of us here on this thread, yet we all see the invasion of Communism here in the states with a party who would love to live under the rule and handouts of the Gov't. They just don't understand the funny money being printed and given to them today will one day have very little to no value...
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2020
Messages
4,940
Reaction score
20,770
Location
San Antonio, TX
This guy...WHAT THE F**K IS WRONG WITH HIM? I mean, seriously? Is he THAT afraid of the SQUAD? When will this F*******G nightmare end?
1647866397428.png

And then there's THIS crazy ass twat. Our country is going to shit REAL FAST!

1647866488736.png

YES, ELECTIONS CERTAINLY DO HAVE CONSEQUENCES!!!!
 

Ssayer

BIT Beta Team
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
19,611
Reaction score
70,954
Location
SE Michigan USA

Paul Hacker

Getting comfortable
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
245
Reaction score
1,275
Anon describes his own concept/theory of the Great Awakening.
Essentially, a LOT of people are going to be rudely shaken awake.

View attachment 122809
V you are spot on, except for ”we should have compassion…”. There is no way in hell I’m giving “them” any compassion after the 4-5 years of hell they put us through because of their inability or unwillingness to wake up their critical thinking skills and common sense. Call me a d**k, but I’m tired of dealing with stupid.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,824
Reaction score
12,280
Location
Charlotte


March 21, 2022
Remain Skeptical



Dear Patriots,


Remain skeptical is the best advice we can give now.

No matter what the topic, do not believe most of what you hear and read.



1- The far left Democrats on the January 6 Committee have admitted that they are only keeping their scam operation going to get past the Midterm Elections.
The Federalist

Democrats Admit Jan. 6 Committee Is All About Midterms

QUOTE:
House Democrats prosecuting political dissidents in the form of the Select Committee on Jan. 6 admitted this week the show trial investigation is all about the November midterms.

On Friday, The Washington Post chronicled the committee's next steps in a feature headlined "Jan. 6 committee faces a thorny challenge: Persuading the public to care" as Americans lose enthusiasm for severe retribution against those involved with a constitutionally protected rally 14 months ago, who are the true target of the committee's work as opposed to perpetrators of the Capitol riot.

One lawmaker, the Post wrote, "added that even some of their Democratic constituents have lost interest in the committee's work because of more pressing issues, like inflation and the coronavirus pandemic." Americans are now coping with gas prices eclipsing their record peak and compounded by an inflation rate running at a four-decade high.

The Jan. 6 probe, however, is dominating lawmakers' priorities, including Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney who is one of two Republicans appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to serve on the panel. Cheney, the Post reported, is "spending the majority of her time on the matter, people familiar with her work say," instead of reclaiming her lost role on the Natural Resources Committee.

In other words, Cheney has devoted her tenure in Congress under the Biden administration to executing a vendetta against former President Donald Trump and his supporters, instead of countering the White House policy running against the interests of her constituents. Nearly half of Wyoming land is under federal oversight, with agriculture and resource extraction serving as two of the state's primary industries. Its sole member of the lower chamber no longer serves on the premier committee to navigate the myriad public lands issues important to Wyoming voters while President Joe Biden aims to choke off new oil and gas leases on federal lands.




2- This is a great piece by Dr. Malone explaining the many reasons we have to be dubious of the entire medical establishment in America.
Robert W Malone MD, MS

Remain Skeptical My Friend

QUOTE:
I'm encouraging us all to bring our own skepticism and curiosity to the present unprecedented moment, in which new Pharma products, such as mRNA vaccines are being consumed by the majority of people in our country, evermore including children. The approval for these products are based upon rushed clinical trials and authorized by an FDA that is now refusing to release the safety data from those clinical trials.


To be perfectly accurate, the FDA agreed to release the information, but wanted 55-years to do it. (Google it: "FDA 55 years"). To be even more accurate, the FDA then asked the Court for 75-years to release the information. Luckily, our courts have not agreed. So, Pfizer has a number of months to now release the data, with the first small bolus released earlier this month.

Unfortunately, the first batch of Pfizer documents released did not cause the state sponsored media to dig deep and do some actual reporting. Instead, those who did report on the contents then were labelled as dealing in MDM (the Homeland Security term for "mis/dis/mal information). It all comes full circle.

Curious? Skeptical? You should be. Because the news media isn't going to do the job for you.





3- Researcher Paul Alexander looks into 44 studies that indicate the Covid-CCP shot was ineffective at best and probably made more people ill.
The Epoch Times

44 Studies on Vaccine Efficacy That Raise Doubts on Vaccine Mandates

QUOTE:
As some people have now been vaccinated for more than half a year, evidence is pouring in about Covid vaccine efficacy. When evaluating vaccine efficacy, it is important to distinguish between efficacy against infection, symptomatic disease, and transmission versus efficacy against hospitalization and death. For infection and symptomatic disease, the COVID-19 vaccines are not as efficacious as hoped, with immunity gradually waning after a few months. For hospitalization and death, immunity is stronger, lasting for at least six months.

The gestalt of the findings implies that the infection explosion globally that we have been experiencing—post double vaccination in e.g. Israel, UK, United States, etc.—may be due to the vaccinated spreading Covid as much or more than the unvaccinated.

Hence, rather than the unvaccinated putting the vaccinated at risk, it could theoretically be the vaccinated that are putting the unvaccinated at risk, but we have not yet seen any evidence for that.

Here I summarize studies and reports that shed light on vaccine induced immunity against Covid. They highlight the problems with vaccine mandates that are currently threatening the jobs of millions of people. They also raise doubts about the arguments for vaccinating children.




4- We continue to fight for our military members who are still fighting the Covid-CCP shot mandates.
Brownstone Institute

The Military's Abusive Imposition of Mandatory Covid Vaccinations

QUOTE:
In the past, the widespread introduction of vaccines has reduced the mortality and morbidity of millions and served as a model for preventative medicine and public health.

However, conditions change when for many a particular vaccine's risks outweigh the benefits, the primacy of protective natural immunity is disregarded, the legality of the mandates and the accuracy of the evidence supporting them are credibly disputed, and the recipients' basic human rights are ignored.

Under such conditions, compulsory administration programs are radical and unacceptable.

Military leaders are required to obey the law and should not require vaccinations when their legality and safety, and the accuracy of the data on which the mandates are based are in doubt. The current military Covid mandates are radical because they violate the following fundamental principles:

• First Amendment allowance for religious exemptions
• Fourth Amendment "right of the people to be secure in their persons"
• Fifth Amendment due process and equal protection of the laws
• Nuremberg Code of 1947 against medical experimentation without informed consent, recognized as US law by the Supreme Court
• Hippocratic Oath, which compels physicians to at first do no harm, which involves considering the risks and benefits to the patient prior to any medical intervention
• The primacy of natural immunity for force protection and mission readiness
The purging of healthy and otherwise qualified military members solely because they refuse to take the Covid vaccine impairs military readiness and security and undermines morale.



5. Today, the January 6 trial for Couy Griffin begins.
Please pray for a good outcome. You can get more information about Couy here: Rumble.



Read. Know. Share. Pray. Fight.

Hold Fast,
Defending The Republic


To have confidence in the outcome of any election, we must continue to demand (1) real paper ballots, (2) hand counted in a bipartisan transparent process, and (3) citizen voter ID.
Missed a newsletter or to revisit a past newsletter? They are archived HERE .
Comments or Questions? Contact: editor@defendingtherepublic.org

Join Our Fight

NOTE: Defending The Republic, Inc. is a §501(c)(4) non-profit organization, gifts to which are not deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes.

Follow Our Progress:
DefendingTheRepublic.org
DefendingTheRepublicPAC.com
SidneyPowell on GETTR
Sidney on Telegram

SidneyPowell.com
DTR's Rumble page!
DTR GETTR




This email was sent by Defending The Republic, located at 2911 Turtle Creek - Suite 300; Dallas, Texas 75219 (United States).
 
Top