Flintstone61
Known around here
Im using zerotier and BI App on iphone on .2.3 and my webserver seems to be working.....lemme turn off wifi....Ok ....yeah it's working on 5G cellular as well.
Does it work using UI3 web page in browser? I don't really use the app for anything other than push notifications. I've had past instances where the mobile app was able to connect and UI3 couldn't - or vice versa, so I presume they use different pathways.Im using zerotier and BI App on iphone on .2.3 and my webserver seems to be working.....lemme turn off wifi....Ok ....yeah it's working on 5G cellular as well.
I appreciate you trying this. I'm pretty certain it's a gremlin in the latest release. It works on .2.2 but not .2.3 and is repeatable with reinstalls/downgrades. I've already sent an email to Ken. I'm pretty simple using unique port forward so no VPN or other go-betweens that could be the culprit. Other family that regularly logs in remotely started complaining immediately.lemme check....well i logged onto the UI3, and it works locally on my BI PC........I haven't used UI3 much.......from a distance.....lemme check...yeah your right.....i tried the WAN remote address from web service and did not get thru...on my phone. But I'm not well versed on How Zerotier and UI3 would interact when attempting to logon at the Wan address, unless I need to add an additional zerotier connection....but whatever I have a pounding headache....
Good job, yes I do have banned IP's . Not sure what to do for DB. Do you continuous record ? You seem to have plenty of storage so somehow you need to reduce records.Ok, for once, I figured something out before Ken. My brother's nearly identical system was able to run 2.3 w/o any remote access issues. So I had him send me a screen shot of his advanced webserver tab. They were identical to mine, except he actually had a few banned IPs (-xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So I created a random wan IP and entered it as a banned IP. Immediately, all other IPs were unblocked. I forwarded this info to Ken.
But it explains why others didn't have the issue. Whether through auto-ban or manual entry, if your ip access list has any banned IPs in it, you would not have noticed this bug.
Now back to the topic of the thread (my apologies for hijacking the thread in the first place).... What is everyone doing to minimize the number of records in the DB? Mine is huge. Compacting doesn't do much.
View attachment 158157
just add -0.0.0.0 to your webserver ip access list. It's under global settings, web server, advanced. A single "banned" IP fixes the issue. Ken said the next release will fix this automatically.Yep, on 5.7.2.3, all of my tablets here were unable to connect. Went back one to 5.7.2.2 and it's all good again.
5.7.2.4 has fixed all my issues nowjust add -0.0.0.0 to your webserver ip access list. It's under global settings, web server, advanced. A single "banned" IP fixes the issue. Ken said the next release will fix this automatically.
I don't get it though. Even if I had the 'right' settings which minimized the amount of clips, wouldn't the large size of the drive eventually accumulate over 200,000 clips anyway on a long enough timeframe? Otherwise what is the point of having a large drive?You must have something set up causing a lot of clips like taking lots of hi res images or wrong cut and combine or something. I used to do that and was over 200,000 but blew them out and now under 10,000 with double the storage that you have.
I disabled it recently when I realized the database kept getting corrupted as soon as the autocompact operated finished, requiring me to completely reconstruct the db every few days. Although this was under a previous version so I wonder if it's been addressed now.You also have the compact/repair unchecked - are you manually doing that on a frequent basis?
I've now set it to 1GB however now the DB status says that the drive is overallocated. How is this possible if I'm decreasing the size and how can I fix it? Is it because the alerts folder is already more than 1GB? Would deleting its contents result in any adverse effects? I haven't changed anything else.Your alerts folder only needs to be 1GB unless you are storing frequent hi-rez images every few seconds LOL, but each one counts as a clip, this making your issue worse
Well my new folder which contains all my clips is only over 5000 items and comprises 90% of my allocated storage, so that shouldn't be a problem, right?I have over 3 times the storage of you and my clips are under 10,000, so larger drives do not equate to over 200,000 clips.